Elon Musk’s FSD v12 demo includes a near miss at a red light and doxxing Mark Zuckerberg — 45-minute video was meant to demonstrate v12 of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving but ended up being a list of thi…::Elon Musk posted a 45-minute live demonstration of v12 of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving feature. During the video, Musk has to take control of the vehicle after it nearly runs a red light. He also doxxes Mark Zuckerberg.

  • @EdibleFriend
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    Eh I hate the dipshit but he has a point. its not really doxxing when he literally just googled it live.

    • @EyesEyesBaby
      link
      English
      69
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If we apply that same theory to @ElonJet, then that wouldn’t be doxxing either. Obviously Elon thinks otherwise. If @ElonJet is doxxing, then so is this.

      • @EdibleFriend
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        never said that wasn’t. basically the same thing.

      • @EdibleFriend
        link
        English
        221 year ago

        lol already talked about that elsewhere. yep its exactly the same thing. im not saying he isn’t a hypocrite

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Excuse me, this is the internet. You have to form a view on someone and then either agree or disagree with everything they do consistently otherwise it’s illegal.

          • @EdibleFriend
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            Lop yep. People are talking to me like I’m some kind of Fanboy when all I really said was maybe, this time, he didn’t actually strangle a puppy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Isn’t that a little bit of circular reasoning?

      If I doxx someone online then it gets indexed by Google, if someone then Google’s the information it stops being doxxing?

      I’d assume most doxxing isn’t done by someone who has unique firsthand knowledge (e.g. “Oh I know John, he lives on so and so road”) and instead is done by finding the information online whether via Google or a different public source.

      At least in the US, where a ridiculous amount of private information is deemed “public”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        releasing the information versus acquiring the released information are two different thing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          Most doxxers don’t technically release the information, rather they’ve acquired it and point others to where they’ve acquired it or simply disseminate it further.

          • @indepndnt
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            disseminate it further.

            AKA release it.

      • @EdibleFriend
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        Not really? Because, in your scenario, Musk would have to be the person to originally post his info. He didn’t even have to go drop a few bucks on spokeo or something

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          That’s what I’m saying. In most cases the doxxer isn’t the one who originally provided the info, but rather someone who has found the information online via a Google search or something similar.

          • @EdibleFriend
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            and in most situations the person releasing the information isn’t doxxing someone whos world famous and takes all of 4 seconds to find information on. usually when you hear about doxxing its…well…someone like you. hidden behind a anon nickname and some weird ass neckbeard digs and digs to find enough information to get your name and go from there.

            Its quite a bit different when the person is one of the wealthiest and most powerful men on the planet and so much about him is just very basic known things.