• NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
    link
    151 year ago

    There are a lot of differing opinions on what should be used, LGBT, LGBTQ, LGBTQ+, LGBTQIA, etc, etc. I appreciate what inclusive acronyms try to do, but it does get very burdensome for non-queer people. I typically just use “queer”, personally, though you obviously have to be a little careful with that one depending on context and perhaps it isn’t always entirely encompassing. E.g. are intersex people “queer”? They just have abnormal sex chromosomes.

    -A queer

    • @Shapillon
      link
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      +1 for the simpler queer term.

      There’s also GRSM (Gender Relational and Sexual Minorities) which I find much more meaningful than LGBTQIA2S+. First it isn’t a mash-up of a load of loosely related terms and, secondly, it also includes D/s relationships or ENM (Ethical Non Monogamy) for example. Sadly it doesn’t seem to be getting much traction anywhere ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
        link
        31 year ago

        Dang, I hadn’t heard of that, but I like it! It’s a shame it isn’t very “catchy” I suppose lol.

    • Carl
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Well imo, to make it easier for people… since the acronym started as LGBT, why not make it LGBT+. It is short and sweet, and less letters to remember.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Personally I’ve always liked GSRM (Gender, Sexual, and Romantic Minorities). Unfortunately that probably won’t catch on anytime soon.

      • @afraid_of_zombies
        link
        41 year ago

        GSRM sounds like a knock off of Grand Theft Auto. Where you cause chaos and crime in some Romanian cities.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      11 year ago

      The 2, in this case, is about respecting Indigenous Canadians. I think it’s warranted.