“Freedom of Speech, not Freedom of Reach - our enforcement philosophy which means, where appropriate, restricting the reach of Tweets that violate our policies by making the content less discoverable.”

Surprise! Our great ‘X’ CEO has brought back one more bad thing that we hated about twitter 1.0: Shadowbanning. And they’ve given it a new name: “Freedom of Speech, Not Reach”.

Perhaps the new approach by X is an improvement? At least they would “politely” tell you when you’re being shadow banned.

I think freedom of speech implies that people have the autonomy to decide what they want to see, rather than being manipulated by algorithm codes. Now it feels like they’re saying, “you can still have your microphone… We’re just gonna cut the power to it if you say something we don’t like”.

  • Wothe
    link
    English
    -5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @Jat620DH27OP
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      “No one can act as a moderator to remove my content” This claim does align with with the principle of freedom of speech, but we have to admit that for now, complete freedom without any control can be unsafe. It could potentially lead to spams and political issues. However, the feature of not asking for phone numbers or email addresses sounds interesting, especially considering Elon is planning to introduce government ID verification.

    • @dilan
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • @s1vgm
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • @s1vgm
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • @Sed
      link
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Removed by mod

    • Campa
      link
      English
      -31 year ago

      deleted by creator