• @musus
    link
    141 year ago

    He will probably kill 10-20 finback whales so we are not talking about very large numbers. Also it would not be good for Icelandic politics if someone would kill him, he could become somekind if whale killer martyr and Iceland would continue to kill whales after his death.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      he could become somekind if whale killer martyr

      Well that’s just as easily solved by more killing. There can’t be more than like 20 people in the country that have a massive boner for murdering whales.

      • @Anomalous_Llama
        link
        51 year ago

        The rise of far right politicians and fascists is directly related to the dramatic drop in assassinations of political figures.

        The solution? Start murdering fascist and far right politicians that exploit the working class and the environment to add to their already endless coffers. This is the only viable answer.

        Change my mind.

    • @RubberElectrons
      link
      131 year ago

      Would it be more whales? Less?

      There’s a minimum whale population before genetic defects start having impact between mates…

      I’m not advocating direct violence, but mixing sand into the hunting boat’s engine oil and other more peaceful methods should be considered if the government won’t listen to reason by its people.

    • @affiliate
      link
      91 year ago

      let the whales decide his fate

          • @Anomalous_Llama
            link
            31 year ago

            One that seems to have fallen out of favor the last few decades with these ultra rich fascist assholes being more prominent all over the globe the last decade or two

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Unless you subscribe to any one of most of the worlds’ belief systems. Or unless your parents did and some of it sort of rubbed off on you. Or if you think law and order is important. But outside of that, yeah, of course, killing is completely neutral moral gray area. /s

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Virtually all legal systems make allowances for killing someone in self-defense.

                  And you could probably fill a library with all the written works on the ethics of killing.

                  But yeah, sure, let’s just pretend that it’s completely self-evident that killing is always wrong.

                  Who said it’s morally neutral?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    “killing isn’t inherently wrong”

                    I don’t care to argue anymore semantics. You get what I’m saying and I get you. I just think that killing feels wrong for good reason, and that’s a very popular opinion. Stop acting like it’s a silly one.

            • @leftzero
              link
              11 year ago

              I’m sure we can find volunteers willing to kill themselves once they’re done with the killing. 🤷‍♂️

    • @Cabrio
      link
      11 year ago

      Then someone should kill them for their stupidity. Cancer doesn’t go away unless you cut it all out.