The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -621 year ago

    Well the average career is 30 years. So you think that if I was to start a photography business that at the end of my 30 year run, half of my career should be publicly available? That means that people could use half of my life’s work without owing me any compensation? Copyright protects a lot of small creators, not just Disney and the likes.

    • @False
      link
      521 year ago

      Good thing you’re covered for 70 years after you’re dead then

      • @Trail
        link
        -121 year ago

        So if you release a movie that took you 5 years to make, you only get paid on the day it is released. Not the next day, because you should not get paid for doing nothing due to work you did in the past. Keep working. Gotcha.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Yes, absolutely. If it takes me a year to make a high-quality table, then I shouldn’t keep getting paid for the table for the rest of my life + 70 years + whatever new extension Disney comes up with.

    • ronalicious
      link
      English
      181 year ago

      but if your work is good enough and better than your competitors it shouldn’t be a problem. that’s how the free market works right?

      the problem here is capitalists want it both ways. they want to be able litigate any competition into oblivion… but hey, it s just business.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -161 year ago

        Way to sweepingly generalize something. I had to use copyright laws when I was a pro track photographer. I found out that one of the drivers owned a printing shop. He was telling people to purchase one photo from me at my price and then turning around, scanning it in, and re-printing them for the customers at a lower price. Same exact work, so you can’t argue about the quality. This fuck was also taking my images and using them in advertising which was also a copyright violation. This isn’t about who took the better picture as I was the person behind the camera. It’s about protecting work, that in my case involved time and actual sweat each and every weekend I was out in the sun. But it seems the majority of people in this thread think that he was justified in stealing MY work.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          121 year ago

          Do people buy your photos decades after you take them? No?

          So reasonable copyright terms like 10 or 15 years should be totally fine with you. Unless you are just emotional about it and ranting online.

        • Glitchington
          link
          41 year ago

          When working at a print shop, we checked for copyright coverage all the time, and even refused orders over it. Watermarking the corner of your images is a good start. You can also make sure your web images are low resolution to prevent reprinting. 300ppi (pixels per inch) at scale is required for printing. Though the real kicker is, YOU are responsible for protecting your copyright, and you probably should have hired a lawyer.

        • @Trail
          link
          11 year ago

          I think you gotta keep it mind that, like reddit, a majority of the people here should be assumed to be teens or so.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -21 year ago

          Hey, just here to let you know that I 100% agree with you. You’re being attacked for no reason.

    • auth
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thats how it works for patents, medicines, etc…

      When someone build a home… There is not even any time at all… You get paid once and then you can forget your past work.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      What percentage of your money would come from 15 year old content you produced? Please reply with the median.