For those who have pre-ordered it is already here, the rest have to wait a little longer. Starfield is finally here! Have you bought it, why or why not? If you’ve already played it, what do you think of it? We are very curious!

Discuss all things Starfield below!

  • R0cket_M00se
    link
    English
    261 year ago

    This is exactly why I didn’t pre order or buy this game, I knew it was going to fall severely short of the expectation.

    A bunch of non connected areas and gameplay loops.

    • @rDrDr
      link
      English
      201 year ago

      They specifically said there were going to be loading screens and no user driven landings. I agree with not preordering games, but I also think you need to actually look at what the dev is saying before you set your expectations.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My expectations are set by the gaming landscape as a whole. For example, virtually all games releasing nowadays have a manual save feature. I expect that. A dev coming out during development to say their game doesn’t have manual saving doesn’t suddenly make that okay.

        It’s an extreme example, but my point is that a dev disclosing something before release shouldn’t magically negate all criticism of it. People are allowed to be frustrated by things this game does poorly that other games excel at, even if the devs were transparent about those shortcomings.

        • R0cket_M00se
          link
          English
          111 year ago

          It’s not even that, I never talked about the space to planet transition because I expected that to be a loading screen.

          I’m talking about how the game itself is structured, I thought the space travel and jumping from system to system was going to be more like elite, but it’s just small instances with loading screens. Was that my fault for assuming that? I mean, they focused so hard on ship customization I assumed space travel was a big part of the game. At least the space gameplay, if not the planetary gameplay.

          Bethesda was super closed off about how exactly the gameplay loop was structured because they knew the truth was going to reduce sales. So they let the reality of it just go unsaid while they kept you focused on the pretty screenshots.

      • R0cket_M00se
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Good strawman, notice how I never specified planetary landings? Cause I already knew that it was going to be a loading screen.

        I’m talking about the fractured nature of the surface and the inability to fly from place to place in space. Or transition from locations in atmosphere. Everything is its own tiny location and fast traveling the rule of thumb. It seems like they kept as little information on this specific aspect as possible until the preorders were in. Probably so that the nature of the game wouldn’t drive away people looking for something with more of an interconnected holistic model of travel. They knew the truth would severely reduce their consumer base so they pretended it was “Star Citizen (with severe limitations)” instead of “Mass Effect: Andromeda (but you can customize and fly the tempest yourself)”

        Someone in here said it best, “I have no idea what the purpose of including space ships and space travel even was.” If that’s a legitimate question in your space game, you failed.

        • @kmkz_ninja
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          At this point, what is functionally the difference between this and The Outer Worlds?

          • R0cket_M00se
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            There really doesn’t seem to be one, honestly.