why?

Because bash feels clunky to write and work with for anything non-trivial, especially compared to other scripting languages.

Why not another scripting language (no compile necessary)?

Because bash and sh are installed nearly everywhere. Any other scripting language means the user is required to have that installed, and that is far less likely to be the case.

If I could write my scripts in a nice syntax, but be sure my users will be able to use it effortlessly by distributing to them compiled versions, then that would make both of our lives easier!

Thoughts? Are there any languges that do this?

  • @dack
    link
    1310 months ago

    I don’t see why bash would be used at all here. If you want something that doesn’t need another interpreter, then just compile a binary.

    • CyclohexaneOP
      link
      fedilink
      810 months ago

      Possible use case: scripts that are found in a codebase for doing… Codebase things. Like setting up dev environment for example.

      • @dack
        link
        510 months ago

        But then building it still requires whatever scripting tool you use. Including the bash-ified version would not for practice, as it wouldn’t be very human readable and would have to be kept in sync with the source script. It’s much cleaner and simpler to just require python for your build environment.