• @jeffw
    link
    English
    771 year ago

    Honestly, what is the point of Wordpad when you have Notepad and Word?

    • GreyBeard
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1411 year ago

      Not everyone has the money for a copy of Word. There once was a time when free rich text editors were valuable. But at this point I agree it isn’t needed anymore. There are plenty of FOSS alternatives to word that hit that market. Microsoft has probably kept it around this long to prevent people from looking, but now they’ve put their bet on cloud services.

      • TheEntity
        link
        fedilink
        28
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There are plenty of FOSS alternatives to word that hit that market.

        Plenty? I know one and its fork. That’s about one and a half.

        EDIT: Oh, you probably meant the rich text editors like Wordpad, not text processors like Word. My bad for misunderstanding.

        • sebinspace
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          ScintillaTE is an old-ass one. Most people have never heard of it, and those that have have only heard of its variant, UniSciTE, which came bundled as the default text editor for Unity, something like 15 years ago.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Assuming you are talking about OpenOffice and LibreOffice, there’s also CollaboraOffice (although this may be counted as another half one, since it’s a online fork of LO) and OnlyOffice in the FOSS sphere. Probably more out there I’m not aware off.

        • @thehatfox
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          I think AbiWord is still around, which used to be the FOSS simple, WordPad-like word processor of choice.

    • @SulaymanF
      link
      English
      331 year ago

      Not all of us have Word, and Notepad doesn’t have rich text or the ability to open .doc files.

        • @PlutoniumAcid
          link
          English
          141 year ago

          And huge. And bloated, if you only need simple functionality.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Except it will nuke .docx formatting. Same in reverse.
          I make templates for my clients and I always tell them not to open and save in any other client other than OpenOffice.
          Even Libre does nuke some parts to some extend…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            It’s not that bad and always improving. I inter operate the two every day.

            OpenOffice is a dead project.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Every time I open anything open office in Word everything is scattered as is usally with the Word meme when moving a picture 2mm.

              Libre aint much better. Also I prefer the OpenOffice design. Libre might be more modern and that’s usually what I prefer but I feel like OO is more efficient with it’s menu.

              Can’t beat the menu ribbon from Word/Office though.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  No as my work is using open office and Ihad some issues creating them with libre and then using it in OO.
                  Outaide of that we have M365 and have no need to go Libre as I can’t see me spending time to relearn it at work.

                  Sounds good though. If I am ever switching to FOSS in that department, I am willing to take a look.
                  I really like the form options and export to pdf of OO/Libre.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re assuming everyone is a power user. There will be thousands of people who won’t have an alternative and think that paying for word is the only option.

          This is to fuck over the casual computer user who doesn’t know better or alternatives. Microsoft already knows that more informed users like us are a lost cause to upsell.

          This is also why they tried that “malware” pop up to get people to go back to Edge. To once again, fuck over uninformed users.

        • @PlutoniumAcid
          link
          English
          91 year ago

          It has been literally twenty years since I last heard any mention of Abiword!

    • dantheclammanOP
      link
      English
      331 year ago

      Honestly I’m not too bummed, especially with open-source solutions like Notepad++, but it’s the end of an era! Also, Word is paid, and so Windows not having a built in free RTF editor is notable

      • Y|yukichigai
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Windows not having a built in free RTF editor is notable

        Yeah, that is a bit odd, but then again when’s the last time you’ve seen something other than a cut-rate eBook in RTF? Everything is either some variant of plain text or a DOC file these days.

        Plus, it’s rare that you ever need to edit RTF files. Read, sure, but that could be handled by Word Viewer, which is free.

        EDIT: Right, they’re discontinuing the viewers, but apparently they have a cloud-based online thing that’s free? Sucks if you live somewhere with crap internet I guess.

        • @T156
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          A lot of ebooks seem to be more epub or pdf these days. RTF isn’t used quite so much.

          • Y|yukichigai
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            RTF is a rarity these days since basically every phone, tablet, and other handheld device can handle either PDFs or HTML (and ePub is basically just a ZIP file with HTML in a specific naming scheme and structure). Back in the day though you’d find RTFs more often for use in budget/jury-rigged eReader options. It’s much easier to parse, if nothing else.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      WordPad (or at least uses to) opens much faster than word, but still has rich text. Perfect for some short notes.

      Or eg to edit an ini file. They display as readable text in WordPad and not just a massive long string like in notepad.

    • Y|yukichigai
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      It’s nowhere near as bloated as Word but you have many more options than Notepad when it comes to formatting and presentation. It’s actually impressive how much you can do within the limits of RTF.

    • @30mag
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • @mvirts
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Also try editing unix or Mac line endings in notepad

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Easy way to distribute rich text documents to users without them having to install anything.

      • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
        link
        English
        381 year ago

        How do people use Wordpad for coding? I’ve never seen that done. If I ever open code in an editor with a “bold” button, I screwed up and close without saving.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          141 year ago

          He must be thinking of notepad. Which I mean, I would not choose to code in Notepad but I wouldn’t actively avoid it like I would wordpad.

            • elrac
              link
              fedilink
              71 year ago

              The “my IDE didn’t recognize the file type and opened it in here by default” editor.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            WordPad was often used if a file was too big for Notepad, over 64 KB. But now there are better options.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Idea! A programming language where text formatting has syntactic meaning! Variable declarations must be italicized! Function calls underlined! And every line justified, of course.

          • TheEntity
            link
            fedilink
            9
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yep, violence it is then. Just like the lines: justified.

          • Walt J. Rimmer
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            If Chicken can be a language, that can be a language!

            And I don’t mean the actually useful programming language. I mean the esolang one where the only valid character is Chicken.

      • @jeffw
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Fair enough