Nine months after Kenneth Smith’s botched lethal injection, state attorney general has asked for approval to kill him with nitrogen

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Yes, I definitely assume it’s about revenge, because, to most people, it’s about revenge. You might call is “justice.” I call it revenge. It’s an eye for an eye. It’s old testament, and Jesus specifically pointed it out as wrong many times. Not only in the story you mentioned. Yet, here we are.

    • @derf82
      link
      English
      -31 year ago

      It is a punishment to fit the crime, as it should be.

      When else does Jesus talk specifically about the death penalty? He was talking about getting hit with turn the other cheek. You can’t turn the other cheek when you are dead.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        It’s society seeking revenge. The dead don’t care.

        The bible talks about not seeking revenge on so many occasions.

        One example:

        Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everyone. If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,” says the Lord. On the contrary: “If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink. In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head.” Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

        Romans 12:17‭-‬21 NIV

        Many other examples. Yet, evangelicals are some of the biggest proponents of this type of government-sanctioned revenge.

        • @derf82
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          That isn’t talking about a secular death penalty, which has prescribed under the pentateuch such as at Numbers 35:16-20. Also, Romans is traditionally believed to be written by Paul and is not a gospel account.

          But what does it matter? Policy should not be based on the Bible.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            You keep going back to the old testament. That’s what Jesus came to rectify.

            Paul’s letters are definitely seen as the among the most consequential scriptures. But you’re right, it doesn’t matter. Everyone has their own interpretation anyway.

            Also, many of your fellow believers in the death penalty do believe that policy should be based on the bible. Just calling out the hypocrisy.

            • @derf82
              link
              English
              01 year ago

              Came to fulfill, not rectify. But while you are in Romans, perhaps consider chapter 13. Especially verse 4.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                Sure, fulfill. Which just proves my point even more.

                Romans 13, 4 does not talk about capital punishment.

                • @derf82
                  link
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.

                  Talks about bearing a sword for punishment. Sure sounds like it includes capital punishment