YAMAPIKARIYA to [email protected] • 1 year ago"journalism"files.catbox.moeimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1687arrow-down133
arrow-up1654arrow-down1image"journalism"files.catbox.moeYAMAPIKARIYA to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareSchwim Dandylinkfedilink56•1 year agoThey report on that because that’s what their readers care about. Don’t hate the player, hate the game.
minus-squareSchwim Dandylinkfedilink6•1 year agoI didn’t state that they couldn’t do both. I stated that their readership didn’t necessarily want both.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-21 year agoBuzzfeed used to do exactly this - they used the revenue from the entertainment/clickbait articles to fund their division that focused on real news reporting. They even won a Pulitzer prize. They shut it down this year due to budget cuts though.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoExcept they also actively silence news people want to hear in the name of politically ideaology
They report on that because that’s what their readers care about. Don’t hate the player, hate the game.
deleted by creator
I didn’t state that they couldn’t do both. I stated that their readership didn’t necessarily want both.
deleted by creator
They literally do both
deleted by creator
Time magazine.
deleted by creator
Buzzfeed used to do exactly this - they used the revenue from the entertainment/clickbait articles to fund their division that focused on real news reporting. They even won a Pulitzer prize. They shut it down this year due to budget cuts though.
I’ll hate both, thanks.
Except they also actively silence news people want to hear in the name of politically ideaology