• @Aux
    link
    English
    -71 year ago

    Yeah, but the mansion is already there and the money went to the builders. So, what’s your plan exactly? Take the money from the builders?

    • @FooBarrington
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      When do you think the last mansion was built?

      • @Aux
        link
        English
        -6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How’s that relevant to my question? It’s not. But I’ll give you the answer, as it seems you’re struggling hard - you can’t split ones wealth. The end.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          you can’t split ones wealth. The end.

          Yes you can, it’s called tax, and it splits off a fraction of your assets when paid.

          No idea why OP was focussing on mansions, but a property tax would sort that problem. Stick a £2m threshold on it so it only hits the filthy rich. Before you whine about asset rich cash poor; dont care sell it if you can’t pay. People are dying.

          • @Aux
            link
            English
            -41 year ago

            You can’t tax wealth. It never works.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Lol. Yes you can. What’s more the absolute best wealth to tax is land/ real estate because it’s really effing hard to hide, and can’t be shifted overseas.

              You can destroy its value by physically removing the building but the bulk of the value is always in the land, the building itself depreciates.

              • @Aux
                link
                English
                -11 year ago

                Ok, you destroy the building and then what? Do you expect an achievement badge to appear above your head or something?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You really have reading comprehension issues don’t you ?

                  The post notes that it’s impossible to hide or move real estate overseas thus making it impossible to avoid.

                  Even if someone tried to avoid the tax by destroying the building you still can’t avoid it because the land is the value not the building.

                  Ergo you pay the property wealth tax or the government reposses the property.

                  Unlike cash that can be hidden the asset is visible and hence tax is easily enforced

                  So to answer your question, the only one who would seek to destroy the building is someone trying to avoid a wealth tax (someone who thinks “I’d rather destroy my asset than pay tax” ie a nutter) in which case the government just seizes the land and the nutter tax avoider gets a banner over his head of “fucking idiot and welcome to jail here’s your blanket dont drop the soap”

                  • @Aux
                    link
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    Did you even read the thread? I’ll repeat the question - you take the mansion, now what? How do you convert a mansion into school uniforms? Oh wait, you don’t! That changes nothing!

        • @FooBarrington
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          Again. The mansions don’t fall from the sky, they are built. Not every mansion has already been built. Why are you acting like people only buy pre-existing mansions?

          • @Aux
            link
            English
            -61 year ago

            What are you talking about? Mmm? I gave you a specific scenario, why are you trying to move goalposts? You lost your argument, just shush now, kid.

            • @FooBarrington
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              You didn’t give any specific example. You just keep repeating “but the mansions are already built”, while mansions are being built right this second. If you want to introduce a specific scenario, you can’t just expect the other person to read your mind, you have to do it.

              • @Aux
                link
                English
                -31 year ago

                I did ask about a specific scenario. If you people can’t comprehend the English language, it’s not my fault. Stop skipping school.

                • @FooBarrington
                  link
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  How do you expect to share a mansion to buy some school uniforms, for example?

                  You only ever talked about mansions. You never specified anything about existing mansions or the like. This situation would be much less embarrassing for you if I couldn’t scroll up and see everything you wrote.

                  • @Aux
                    link
                    English
                    -31 year ago

                    Ok, you don’t like mansions and can’t produce any valid argument, fine. Let’s talk about shares. You forcefully transfer £20m worth of shares from a rich guy into your name. What’s next?