Republican strategists are exploring a shift away from “pro-life” messaging on abortion after consistent Election Day losses for the GOP when reproductive rights were on the ballot.

At a closed-door meeting of Senate Republicans this week, the head of a super PAC closely aligned with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., presented poll results that suggested voters are reacting differently to commonly used terms like “pro-life” and “pro-choice” in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, said several senators who were in the room.

The polling, which NBC News has not independently reviewed, was made available to senators Wednesday by former McConnell aide Steven Law and showed that “pro-life” no longer resonated with voters.

“What intrigued me the most about the results was that ‘pro-choice’ and ‘pro-life’ means something different now, that people see being pro-life as being against all abortions … at all levels,” Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said in an interview Thursday.

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said the polling made it clear to him that more specificity is needed in talking about abortion.

“Many voters think [‘pro-life’] means you’re for no exceptions in favor of abortion ever, ever, and ‘pro-choice’ now can mean any number of things. So the conversation was mostly oriented around how voters think of those labels, that they’ve shifted. So if you’re going to talk about the issue, you need to be specific,” Hawley said Thursday.

  • @TheJims
    link
    351 year ago

    Forced Birth is more accurate

    • @PostmodernPythia
      link
      201 year ago

      Pro Gestational Slavery. Let’s not pretend it’s less grotesque than it is.

      • @DarthBueller
        link
        21 year ago

        I just was reading some environmental messaging research, and one thing that I realized is that about half of folks don’t have a large vocabulary. I guarantee that “gestational” is too uncommon a word for mass appeal.

        • @PostmodernPythia
          link
          21 year ago

          I’m sure. I mostly use that term for accuracy, because I don’t believe language will change minds on this issue.

          • @DarthBueller
            link
            11 year ago

            The idea is not to grab the imagination of the enemy, it’s to grab the imagination of the “give me a reason to think or care about something but I still vote” folks. Whoever they are.