The annual summit of the Group of 20 economies is the largest gathering of world leaders ever in New Delhi, with attendees including President Joe Biden, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and others.
They will be greeted by some of the cleanest streets New Delhi has seen, ornamented by hundreds of thousands of lush flowers potted on freshly painted pavements. What they will not see are the hundreds of thousands of people who have been displaced, or the slums that have been flattened or obscured by temporary fences bearing the G20 summit’s logo and photos of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Modi’s government hopes the beautification project will help showcase the best of what the world’s most populous country has to offer, further cementing its position on the global stage.
Anything that might disrupt that effort is unwelcome.
deleted by creator
These houses were there for several years without a problem, paying utilities and housing poor children and women, suddenly they are illegal because someone wants to use this opportunity for their own disgusting motives. While we’re discussing G20, you know what’s really ironic, it’s that in a country where 80% of the population would die of hunger if not fed by public welfare. They are serving delegates of foreign countries in utensils made up of gold and silver.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Well, that changes everything. You know what, they should just shoot them!! They aren’t human anyway.
/s
deleted by creator
Oh, well as long as they were illegal homes this is okay then!
In the US this would be a slam dunk case for adverse possession.
deleted by creator
Have the courts found them to be illegal? There is a procedure to be followed for demolishing illegal encroachments. Demolitions of ‘illegal’ houses have recently been stopped by if I remember correctly the Punjab High Court.
deleted by creator
First, the word is ‘illegal’. Second, the houses are only illegal if a court has found them to be encroaching on public property. Third, even if they are illegal, the owners have to first be served notice to vacate. (It appears they were not.)
Also I mentioned the Punjab HC’s verdict because in India the judgement of a High Court or the Supreme Court establishes a legal precedent that applies across the entire country.
Don’t feed the troll. These Upper Caste fucks only know how to bootlick the Hindutvadi regime.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Thanks for the source. But I was saying they do not seem to have been served notice. I made that assumption based on this line:-
‘Residents … alleged that the demolitions were carried out in complete violation of laws … that eviction notices were only served as bulldozers were rolling into their street.’
(Source: https://www.thehindu.com/article66838590.ece)
I haven’t listened to the complete podcast, and I’m sure this is just one side of the story; the municipality will have their own version.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator