Archived page

    “Even after a judge required ACS to reunite Ms. Rivers with her baby, ACS continued to subject Ms. Rivers to needless court proceedings and a litany of conditions that interfered with her parenting of TW for months, while the unlawful removal of her baby was ratified by senior ACS leadership,” the complaint reads. “This was not because ACS was trying to protect TW; this was because Ms. Rivers is Black.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    It sounds like you’re just not familiar with how CPS works, no offense. If a child is being subjected to an unsafe situation they can legally remove a child, whether the conduct rises to the level of illegal conduct or not.

    Medical professionals are mandatory reporters (I’m not sure if that’s the same legal term in NY, my experiences with CPS have been with several other states). That means they are legally required to notify CPS if they see or THINK they see evidence of abuse. Allegations must be investigated before being acted upon.

    I can certainly see why you don’t like the fact that the hospital tested the baby for marijuana but if it means they need to modify treatment of the baby they absolutely can do that. Testing the mother may be different, like I said I don’t have experience with the NY system.

    In short it sounds like you are just not familiar with the standard processes of CPS and are actively interpreting everything in a negative way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      You don’t get to randomly drug test random individuals who have no broken the law. That’s a violation of human rights. The mother would not have consented to a drug test of her or her baby. Even if they get reported, that isn’t probable cause.

      Imagine if that were the case. One racist nurse could say that every ethnic mother that comes in smelled like weed, and both mother and child get forcibly drug tested based on that? Do you want to live in that world?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I’m sorry but what you just described is not even close to what was alleged in the article and frankly incorrect on several points. I have no intention of arguing against a strawman, I’ve made several othee comments in this thread which add context to the situation, you should read them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          I did. From how it reads, you definitely think what I’m saying. You really think CPS can and should violate human rights.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                4
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Well if you tried actually reading the article it sounds like the settlement was for the delay in returning the baby and the practice of using pot use as a negative factor. Not testing the baby or mother for marijuana, and not removing the baby because the mother smoked pot in the hospital while pregnant. Headlines are not an adequate source of information, you have to keep reading.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    31 year ago

                    Do you think that’s some magic phrase you can parrot with absolutely no context? Let try an easy one: what human right did they violate? Are you referring to one of the 30 defined by the UN? If so which one? Are you using a different definition? If so cite your reference please.

    • Doug HollandOP
      link
      English
      -31 year ago

      Guilty as charged. I am ignorant of how CPS works, except that I used to watch Judging Amy. I’m operating solely on instinct here — I don’t trust cops, and this news item has the odor of cops.

      That said, most of what you say makes sense, and the concept of mandatory reporters hadn’t popped into my head at all, thanks. Assuming it’s illegal for children to have cannabis in their blood, I can almost see mandatory reporting coming into play.

      Except, we’re in New York, where marijuana is legal. Are all hospitals testing all newborns, and seizing them for CPS/APS if they test positive for marijuana? They’d be seizing an awful lot of newborns.

      My guess — still utterly uninformed, I’ll admit — is that New York newborns are only tested for marijuana if Mom is black and has pissed off the hospital staff.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        The article said a nurse witnessed the mother smoking pot in the hospital room, I would err on the side of assuming that was the reason the baby was tested. The article says there is a history of racism at CPS in NY towards black people which yeah, that’s an issue. But I’m unwilling to assume that about hospital workers given that the inherent basis of medical work is to treat everyone as best you can regardless of personal feelings.

        • Doug HollandOP
          link
          English
          -11 year ago

          The article said a nurse witnessed the mother smoking pot in the hospital room, I would err on the side of assuming that was the reason the baby was tested.

          Agreed — I can’t even muster any doubt that that’s why.

          Seems a fairly obvious conclusion that she smoked pot in her hospital room, which led someone to order a marijuana test on both mother and child. That test led to the child being taken away.

          A quick Googling suggests that the penalty for smoking indoors in New York is a fine of up to $2,000. Seems harsh, but we don’t want people smoking indoors, so levy the fine.

          It doesn’t say that the penalty is losing your child.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Yeah but you’re thinking of it as an action being punished. She was not reported to the police for doing something illegal, even though they technically could have. The hospital was not trying to punish her, they were trying to make sure the child was safe. CPS didn’t take the child away because the mother smokes pot (see caveat at the end), they took the child away because the mother smoked while pregnant. Not to punish her, to protect the baby.

            Caveat: a major point of the article is that CPS had been continuing to use smoking pot as a factor of determining unsafe conditions, which they should not have been doing once pot was made legal. Just like smoking cigarettes is not illegal and shouldn’t be a factor in and of itself. However, smoking cigarettes or pot AROUND children is still a negative factor.

            • Doug HollandOP
              link
              English
              -31 year ago

              I don’t see any of what happened happening if she hadn’t smoked marijuana in her hospital room, so I can’t envision how what happened isn’t punishment for that act.

              You’re saying they took the child away because the mother smoked while pregnant. I’d like to know how common that is. Are newborns taken away if staff is aware any mother smokes pot while pregnant?

              Did health care workers remain mandated to report marijuana use after is became legal?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                Obviously there could be mountains of context we don’t have which could push this in either direction. I do know subjecting children to second hand smoke is absolutely a factor which can result in CPS getting involved.

                Tovthecbwsr of my knowledge hospital workers have never been mandated to report drug usage to the police, I know for a fact it’s explicitly illegal for medical staff to report drug use to the police, with one major exception: if there is evidence of harm to the user.

                As for reporting drug use to CPS: probably depending on the drug. Again, pot use is legal, but if you get high around your children to the point where you are diminished in your ability to care for that child it becomes an issue.

                • Doug HollandOP
                  link
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  You must be a teacher — you’re good at this. Your third paragraph is an eye-opener, and makes all this make somewhat more sense to me. Someone who’s toking in a hospital bed might be someone who tends to toke to excess.

                  Even second-hand smoke — my instant response is to say that’s nuts, because I’m old and grew up with kids who must’ve had black lung by junior high school, just from their parents’ second hand smoke. But it’s a different era, and there’s no doubt that it’s harmful to kids.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    Heh, not a teacher, I’ve just been in a career for a long time that primarily requires explaining data to people. I spent enough years as a data analyst to know how bad policing in the US is, the numbers are pretty damn clear. It definitely sounds like NY CPS has its issues but I’ve seen a lot of data around what other state CPS organizations do and they get a lot of crap to do an insanely difficult job.