Former President Donald Trump’s legal team may need to come up with a more “creative argument” in defending him as their legal one “ain’t working,” former Republican National Committee (RNC) chairman Michael Steele said on Saturday.

Steele’s comments come after Trump’s former chief of staff Mark Meadows was handed a legal loss on Friday after trying to move his case to a federal court instead of a state one.

The former White House chief of staff is facing two criminal counts, accused of trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia, along with Trump and 17 other associates of the former president. All 19 defendants from Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ indictment have pleaded not guilty to their various charges. Meadows took the stand in Georgia last week to argue that his case should be tried in federal court, given that his actions tied to the indictment fell under his responsibilities as chief of staff.

U.S. District Judge Steve Jones wrote in his 49-page filing order on Friday, however, that Meadows’ actions fell outside the requirements of a White House chief of staff.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A Chewbacca defense doesn’t make sense, that’s its purpose.

    A Shaggy defense always makes sense

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Being ‘buck naked banging on the bathroom floor’ may actually be evidence presented against Trump.

      So the Shaggy defense may be unironically used in this case.