Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has said the death of Yevgeny Prigozhin – the Russian mercenary leader whose plane crashed weeks after he led a mutiny against Moscow’s military leadership – shows what happens when people make deals with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

As Ukraine’s counteroffensive moves into a fourth month, with only modest gains to show so far, Zelensky told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria he rejected suggestions it was time to negotiate peace with the Kremlin.

“When you want to have a compromise or a dialogue with somebody, you cannot do it with a liar,” Volodymyr Zelensky said.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -22
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That all sounds like brigading emotional nonsense. In fact, there were strong reasons for Russia to invade. It is probably true that Russia was manipulated into invading, it had no choice because of strategic decisions made by Ukraine. It’s a shame none of the people you talked to were able to argue the issues sensibly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Lol Ukraine strategically decided not to surrender their territory, thus manipulating the peaceful Russians to invade

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Why should Russia strategically be required to invade exactly?

      I’ve never heard a cogent argument on this point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        It’s because Russia sees NATO as a threat and wants to take control of Ukraine to keep buffer states on the west side. Also, to keep it’sblack sea fleet safe. Why it happened now and not sooner or later - nobody knows. The official reasoning, of course, is bullshit, just like with any other war. Not the worst one, though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Okay, but you didn’t actually answer the question, you just pointed to the geopolitical equivalent of blurry sasquatch footage. What’s the strategic logic?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -51 year ago

            M.A.D.

            Seems like a really dishonest question when you’re pretending not to understand such a basic concept. Unless you want me to believe that you’re an idiot or something?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              The MAD play would be to stay within their borders and make sure their nukes and delivery systems are all in good working order. Escalating at great cost and with a risk to internal stability isn’t very good from a MAD perspective.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -21 year ago

                Agreed but here we are. They’re now arming their fascist puppet state with ATACMS and installing nukes in Finland, which is just eliminating MAD by reducing the time that Russia can respond.

    • @kazakhspy
      link
      111 year ago

      Well here is your chance. Argue this issues sensibly.

      • @uberkalden
        link
        16
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Probably the tired line of NATO expansion fears. How’d that work out? Does Russia have more or less NATO countries near their borders? The invasion itself is the best sales pitch NATO could ever need.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            So Russia says: “Nooo, nooo, don’t band together to defend yourself against our aggression! You mustn’t band together to defend against me! Wait if you even dare think about it, I’ll invade you. So here come the tanks”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -101 year ago

              What aggression? NATO is the obvious aggressor here? You don’t even believe what you’re saying. This propaganda is stale man. Even NATO admits it was the provoker.

                  • @uberkalden
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    There was no NATO aggression. The response doesn’t make sense anyways. It only strengthens NATO. Are you actually Russian? I can’t make any other sense of your stance here

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    Ukraine wanting to join NATO is NATO aggression? Lol France & Germany even said they wouldn’t allow them in

          • @uberkalden
            link
            -21 year ago

            Lol, lemmygrad. GTFO with your bullshit

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      It is probably true that Russia was manipulated into invading, it had no choice because of strategic decisions made by Ukraine.

      Of course Russia had a choice. Not invading a country is the easiest thing to do. I do it every day, and I have nowhere near the power and resources that Vlad Putin does.

    • @Bytemeister
      link
      Ελληνικά
      21 year ago

      I mean look, it’s a nation we talked in to giving up it’s nuclear weapons in exchange for protection and recognition by us. We really had no choice but to invade.