“I no longer love blue skies. In fact, I now prefer gray skies. The drones do not fly when the skies are gray.” That’s what a young Pakistani boy named
Personal insults assuming that I’m not extremely educated on this topic and have made decisions based on these that were routed through a legal review. I actually find this a little entertaining. By all means, continue.
I’m not the one writing silly replies and then deleting and reposting new ones to fake sounding like the more enlightened one.
Nobody “extremely educated on this topic” would write something as breathtakingly dumb as claiming Geneva Conventions were never intended to save civilians. They’re centered on protections for civilians, non-combatants, the land of non-combatants, areas where wars are prohibited to protect civilians, and so on. It’s obvious to anyone who actually studied the topic that you’re BSing and a fraud. I don’t have to show you my international politics degree to call you out on it or paste in my papers on the topic because I know you won’t accept it no matter how much of the actual conventions I post. But you’re predictable; you’ll still insist on the last word and find a way to demean a stranger on the internet like me in the hopes that others around you think maybe you’re smart or knowledgeable because you claim you went toe-to-toe with someone at Harvard (conveniently without witnesses). Want me to clap?
Here’s a hint; when you write a reply, I get a copy of it as a notification until you delete that reply. So I see you spouting off until you realize how bad you look and delete it and then reply again with something calmer. You’re not fooling anyone once you get called out on the behavior. Edit: everyone watch as he must have the last word and defend his ego from attack or criticism.
I replied twice to one comment but I did not delete the other one. Look for yourself. You make a lot of claims without actually fact checking. Keep going, I haven’t had a climax this big since the last baby I ate. I’m close.
Personal insults assuming that I’m not extremely educated on this topic and have made decisions based on these that were routed through a legal review. I actually find this a little entertaining. By all means, continue.
I’m not the one writing silly replies and then deleting and reposting new ones to fake sounding like the more enlightened one.
Nobody “extremely educated on this topic” would write something as breathtakingly dumb as claiming Geneva Conventions were never intended to save civilians. They’re centered on protections for civilians, non-combatants, the land of non-combatants, areas where wars are prohibited to protect civilians, and so on. It’s obvious to anyone who actually studied the topic that you’re BSing and a fraud. I don’t have to show you my international politics degree to call you out on it or paste in my papers on the topic because I know you won’t accept it no matter how much of the actual conventions I post. But you’re predictable; you’ll still insist on the last word and find a way to demean a stranger on the internet like me in the hopes that others around you think maybe you’re smart or knowledgeable because you claim you went toe-to-toe with someone at Harvard (conveniently without witnesses). Want me to clap?
I have not modified or deleted any of my comments. Are you okay?
Here’s a hint; when you write a reply, I get a copy of it as a notification until you delete that reply. So I see you spouting off until you realize how bad you look and delete it and then reply again with something calmer. You’re not fooling anyone once you get called out on the behavior. Edit: everyone watch as he must have the last word and defend his ego from attack or criticism.
I replied twice to one comment but I did not delete the other one. Look for yourself. You make a lot of claims without actually fact checking. Keep going, I haven’t had a climax this big since the last baby I ate. I’m close.