X is suing California over social media content moderation law::X, the social media company previously known as Twitter, is suing the state of California over a law that requires companies to disclose details about their content moderation practices.

    • @dragonflyteaparty
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      What is precisely unlimited about this? Should companies be able to keep whatever they want behind the curtain and we aren’t allowed to ask what it is?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -101 year ago

        You said that government business is whatever the government passes laws about, which literally gives the government unlimited justification to do anything and everything because, by definition, it’s the proper business of government under that standard.

        • @Viking_Hippie
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          It’s the job of the government to inspect and regulate businesses and this is a reasonable and frankly way overdue example of them doing exactly that. Nothing unreasonable about it and calling it unlimited intrusion or whatever makes you look like the dumbest of libertarians, which is REALLY saying something.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -101 year ago

            No, it isn’t the purpose of government to just make demands of private businesses. It’s absolutely unreasonable for the government to do so with intent to censor

            • @Viking_Hippie
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              None of that is true. Go away if you the only thing you have to contribute is libertarian lies about basic accountability being tyranny.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -91 year ago

                Lmao why should I go away just because you have nothing except outright lies to defend your demands to terminate basic rights.

                • @Viking_Hippie
                  link
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  why should I go away

                  Because you have nothing but lies and misunderstandings of basic facts to contribute, neither of which are beneficial to anyone.

                  because you have nothing except outright lies

                  Going for the gold medal in projection?

                  demands to terminate basic rights

                  There’s no basic right to facilitate stochastic terrorism.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -71 year ago

                    The fact the you bring up shit like “stochastic terrorism” just proves my point. I see no further reason to engage since you’re clearly off the deep end

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  How does asking to see how they moderate their content behind closed doors terminating basic rights? Can you describe which right they’re terminating here?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Governments make demands of private businesses all the time with things like workers rights, safety regulations, emissions standards, etc. We don’t live in a libertarian no holds barred corporate wonderland and we’re better for it as these businesses have long proved they can’t be trusted if left to their own devices.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Is that what they did or did they just create a narrowly defined law for a specific purpose?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -81 year ago

        It doesn’t matter how narrow a law is if the government has no fucking place making that law