• @SCB
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    So you agree they deserve sanctions and this is a good thing.

    Why are you arguing?

    • @hark
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      I said “Being a hell state isn’t a criterion for sanctions.” Sanctions don’t work the way you think they do. They don’t actually punish the people who make hell states the hell states that they are. If they did, then the hell state that would be among those that deserve it the most would be the USA. Do you agree with this?

      • @SCB
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        No, but whether or not I agree the US should be sanctioned is not relevant here.

        • @hark
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          Cool, because being a “hell state” is not relevant for sanctions.

          • @SCB
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Iran’s government is the reason we sanctioned Iran.

            • @hark
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Yeah, because they reclaimed the oil instead of handing it over to western companies.

              • @TokenBoomer
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                I like you. Remind me to never argue with you.

              • @SCB
                link
                English
                01 year ago

                No, because they’re a totalitarian islamic nightmare.

                  • @SCB
                    link
                    English
                    -1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah I’m all for destabilizing them too. Let’s do it in lieu of carbon taxes since it will have the same net result for the average American.

                    I am most definitely pro-intervention. Freedom is non-negotiable, and free countries have a moral imperative to spread liberal democracy across the planet. The strong have an obligation to protect the weak.