• @hark
    link
    English
    01 year ago

    I said “Being a hell state isn’t a criterion for sanctions.” Sanctions don’t work the way you think they do. They don’t actually punish the people who make hell states the hell states that they are. If they did, then the hell state that would be among those that deserve it the most would be the USA. Do you agree with this?

    • @SCB
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      No, but whether or not I agree the US should be sanctioned is not relevant here.

      • @hark
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        Cool, because being a “hell state” is not relevant for sanctions.

        • @SCB
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Iran’s government is the reason we sanctioned Iran.

          • @hark
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Yeah, because they reclaimed the oil instead of handing it over to western companies.

            • @TokenBoomer
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              I like you. Remind me to never argue with you.

            • @SCB
              link
              English
              01 year ago

              No, because they’re a totalitarian islamic nightmare.

                • @SCB
                  link
                  English
                  -1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah I’m all for destabilizing them too. Let’s do it in lieu of carbon taxes since it will have the same net result for the average American.

                  I am most definitely pro-intervention. Freedom is non-negotiable, and free countries have a moral imperative to spread liberal democracy across the planet. The strong have an obligation to protect the weak.

                  • @hark
                    link
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    This is your brain on american propaganda.