• Flower of Anarchy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    Climate change must be stopped by any means necessary. Start doing what must be done. You know what that means.

      • @kier
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not enough. We (rich and not so rich) must either consume less, or be less people.

        The first route involves changing technologies AND habits. And I’m not talking about recyclable bags or save water at home.

        • SeaJ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          You change habits by making it more expensive to do unsustainable shit. Very few states here in the US are willing to properly tax carbon emissions. Very few Americans are willing to remove the subsidies that the beef industry enjoys which would see steak at $35/lb.

          Just saying “consume less” does very little. People respond to incentives. Peoples’ wallets are big incentives.

          • @kier
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            On the other hand, this problem is global. We all need to work together in order to succeed. That’s the hardest part.

      • Che Banana
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I HAVE ALL THE PAPER STAWS* IM DOING MY BEST!!! *now with more cancer microplastics!

          • milkjug
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Way ahead of ya burp

          • @SCB
            link
            English
            -8
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That would not fight climate change at all.

            • SeaJ
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              It would significantly lower emissions given that the rich produce a hell of a lot more emissions than the average person.

              • @SCB
                link
                English
                31 year ago

                They objectively do not because no percent of people are rich.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I mean if we lived in a society where we could tax billionaires out of existence, then we could probably solve climate change with all that tax revenue.

              • @SCB
                link
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Killing rich people doesn’t stop people from driving cars or eating livestock or flying on airplanes or trading on sea lanes or requiring heat for their homes/water/etc or needing electricity

    • @PutangInaMo
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      What does that mean? I’m a little slow over here, but happy to help.

    • @Widowmaker_Best_Girl
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Big words, why don’t you go ahead and show us how it’s done then? Or are you just going to chest pound from behind your monitor?