Let’s hope this isn’t just a random patent, and we actually get better sticks next generation.

  • MudMan
    link
    fedilink
    481 year ago

    It is absolutely amazing that nobody seems to have clicked through to the actual article.

    So for all the “just use hall effect sticks” people, the patent is apparently not just for a solution to drift but also a way to add variable pressure to sticks, kinda like what Sony does to triggers.

    It took me like fifteen seconds to read deep enough to find that.

    For what it’s worth, I think it could be interesting, especially if applied in a Nintendo-like way, bur proprietary stuff like that tends to go underutilized. You know, like the triggers on the PS5 controller.

      • MudMan
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        For the haptic feedback? No, it’s a mechanical screw with a physical stop to keep it from turning at the right time. You can see it disassembled here. The sensor may be a hall effect sensor, I don’t actually know, but once again, the patent isn’t about drift.

        Watching that video gave me flashbacks about how much of a pain in the ass these are to disassemble, too, which is why I have several of these with stick drift issues just gathering dust instead of actually repairing them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      It’s not clear, then, whether developers would be able to change the resistance of the fluid to provide some sort of force feedback, or a resistance similar to that of the triggers in the PS5‘s DualSense controller (for steering in racing games, for example).

      For someone who supposedly read the article you seem to be making big assumptions

      • MudMan
        link
        fedilink
        23
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, I read the whole thing, including that line, but that’s entirely editorializing from the reporter. The quotes from the actual patent are pretty clear, machine translation word soup aside.

        You being nitpicky made me go dig up the full patent, which makes it even clearer: “(…) The intensity of the magnetic field can be designated from the application. Thus, it is possible to perform flexible control in accordance with the application”.

        I don’t blame the commenters for not going that extra step, though, that’s just me being fastidious. I do blame the reporters focusing on stick drift because mah clicks for not reading the patent properly, though.

        EDIT: For what it’s worth, I find the idea of a stick being full of ferrofluid or whatever else they’re using for this to be… likely finicky and potentially messy and fragile, depending on how much you need in there to make it work properly. This sounds intriguing and weirdly high-tech, but if you made me bet I wouldn’t feel comfortable putting money on this showing up on a Switch 2 just yet. Could be wrong, though.

          • MudMan
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I mean, that’s fair enough, I suppose. Like I said elsewhere I’ve had more problems with the PS5 controllers than the Switch ones, but my guess is this is luck of the draw. Some people just don’t like the Joycon form factor, and that’s also fair. I have some wrist issues and split controllers are amazing for my specific issues, so I’m very on board with the design for very specific reasons.

            FWIW, I suspect a lot of the issues people report with those things are down to connectivity, not build quality. The BT antenna in those is terrible and it’s being power starved to run on their tiny batteries. I’ve used literally hundreds of Joycon at one point or another and rarely seen legit stick drift, but I’ve had controllers where in a noisy environment just your hand grip could make the connection get all flaky. What the Switch does in that scenario seems to be to just hold your stick position and call it a day, which isn’t great.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I found a comment about the accuracy of the reader combined with a factual difference from the article very ironic and should be elaborated, which you did. +1