Although this is from yesterday, I thought there were some good points, that makes it worth seeing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    I’d guess that if he was an agent, he isn’t acting voluntarily. Instead he’s probably influenced by chinese and saudi money.

    Another simpler, but just as plausible explanation could be that he’s basically a human with a giant ego that bounces from one incident to another. None of this seems very planned. Instead he seems to be acting on a whim.

    • @BuffaloxOP
      link
      101 year ago

      bounces from one incident to another.

      That doesn’t mach how he consistently has parroted Russian propaganda for 1½ year.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I guess that could be explained with the giant ego. Due to being so smart, he understands the situation better than the mainstream media. The easiest opposing view to latch onto would then be Russian propaganda.

        EDIT: I have several friends who are also smart, and as such must question all msm news. As a result their worldview is left with a void that is usually filled with more fringe opinions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I would still argue that Hanlon’s razor applies: “Never attribute to malice that which can adequately be explained by stupidity.”

        • @BuffaloxOP
          link
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Except we now know Musk is a full blown narcissist. The pedophile incident is just one example, but there are also other examples, like how he treats minorities, and frequently behaves like a bully on twitter. Together with his support for Trump who also support Russia, the picture is crystal clear. That when it regards Elon Musk we could apply what we could call a reverse Hanlon’s razor, never apply to ignorance that which can be explained by narcissist malice.

          PS: I’m guessing you didn’t watch the video. Because the consistency is pretty clear.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I have now, but that doesn’t really change my mind. You have a point and it becomes a matter of semantics. I don’t think it’s actual malice in that he consciously wants to cause harm (on balance), but that he is so thoroughly misguided because of his own sense of infallibility, that he truly thinks he is a force for good in the world. Is that stupidity? It becomes a matter of definition. The video is too short and selective to really make any call based on it. “There are no ‘ordinary’ Russians on Twitter”? How can he tell? Maybe he has explained that in previous videos.