Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine::Google accused DOJ of aiming to force people to use “inferior” search products.

  • @schmidtster
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    Just because it’s done that way doesn’t mean we can’t fix the issue.

    • El Barto
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Oh for sure. I was just pinpointing the fatalistic reaction.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        It’s not “fatalistic”, it’s “fine” this way.

        A judge doesn’t have to know what mozilla is before a trial starts. Council can tell them what it is, how/whether it matters to the case, etc.

        It’s the lawyers that have the duty to inform the judge. You can’t rely on every judge knowing everything about all topics. And they don’t really need to…

        • El Barto
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          I know what you’re saying, and I understand it. But again, I’m not talking about how I perceive it, but how the other commenter described it (“we’re doomed!”) And like you, I thought it was an overreaction.