• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You may as well have shown a picture of people enjoying dating and music in the 60s.

    I think some decades were much better than today for sure, at least in terms of enjoying life.

    I would go to the 60s rather than go to the future if given the choice. I used to be the other way, looking forward to the future because cool tech etc. But not now.

    • @MrsDoyle
      link
      261 year ago

      As a woman who was a teenager in the 1960s, yeah no thanks. Once was enough. Good music but everything else was shite.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In what way? I would love to hear more about it, honestly. From my perspective it seems super relaxed and people were friendly and loving… But that’s just from watching TV shows about it. I’m born 1975…

        • Flying Squid
          link
          131 year ago

          I sure wouldn’t want to be black or a woman in the 1960s.

        • @samus12345
          link
          English
          71 year ago

          For starters, ever heard of the Vietnam War?

        • @angrymouse
          link
          61 year ago

          I’m assuming you are from US, so I don’t think any woman or black person from there will agree with you. These ppl had no rights or these were ignored in the majority of your country. In 1959 the last baseball team starts to accept Negros in their teams. I don´t believe that one year after everything were fine. And if you talk about any other place out of US, well, it is worse, Europe has families divided by cold war, IIrc UK we’re having an economic crisis… I really believe that were bobbles during this time, but it was for a minority

        • @PoetSII
          link
          21 year ago

          In what way?

          Idk something tells me being black or gay or a woman or an American or Vietnamese man from the ages 18-24 wouldn’t be too hot in the 60s but what do I know, we only have entirely unfettered access to historical documents from the time.

    • @angrymouse
      link
      71 year ago

      Vietnamese ppl: I’m a joking to you?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      I don’t think this would be as good as you think, because we can’t “unknow” what we know today. The obvious one is giving up all the social progress we’ve made since then. Also, imagine knowing about climate change and being surrounded by people who either don’t know or are worried about it but don’t have the science we have today to understand the issue. All the nightmares we have today will still happen, but you’re trapped in the past knowing it all and not being able to do anything about it.

    • @demlet
      link
      -31 year ago

      60s…? With the stinky self-righteous hippies and overblown music? I have it on good authority that the 70s were actually where it was at.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Overblown music? What in tarnation are you talking about? Some of the greatest songs ever written were recorded in that decade.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            51 year ago

            It’s true that Jimi Hendrix can’t match up with the incredible music of Ed Sheeran, but he tried.

            • @demlet
              link
              11 year ago

              Well, if that’s your comparison, sure… Music changes, and musical tastes vary, so I’ll avoid trying to give examples or make comparisons, I just don’t think music of that era was particularly better than music since then. It’s a weird fluke of history that we developed decent recording and playback technology right as the 60s bands were coming up. That probably explains why it holds such a grip on culture. But personally I think there have been some incredible musicians since the 60s.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                31 year ago

                You called it overblown. Now you’re saying it’s just as good as what happened later. I think you need to make up your mind.

                • @demlet
                  link
                  -11 year ago

                  Actually I said sort of the opposite: what’s been done since then is just as good as what was done back then, which therefore is overblown by people who claim it’s somehow better. No contradiction.

                  • SokathHisEyesOpen
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    Nobody claimed it was better. You said it was overblown, to which I countered that some of the best music ever recorded is from that era, therefore not overblown. Some of the best music ever recorded is newer too. But for rock and roll, that was the era in which a lot of magic happened, a lot of progress was made, and it changed the face of music for everything that came after. So it’s not overblown. That doesn’t mean it’s better than whatever music you think I’m comparing it to. It means that it stands on its own as worthy of the praise it receives.

            • @demlet
              link
              01 year ago

              Sorry, I’m just used to hearing how much better music used to be in the 60s from people my parents’ age.

              • SokathHisEyesOpen
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I expanded my statement in a reply to one of your other comments, but I never said it was “better”. I said it’s not overblown. Better is almost entirely subjective and would require a comparison, which was never given.