@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoOpinion: It’s not that we have too many people. It’s that we have too few houseswww.theglobeandmail.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1124arrow-down110cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1114arrow-down1external-linkOpinion: It’s not that we have too many people. It’s that we have too few houseswww.theglobeandmail.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square28fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@givesomefuckslinkEnglish6•1 year agoYou’re working under assumption most homes have people.living in them…
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilink6•1 year agoThat is a 100% indisputably correct assumption. Vacancy taxes worked where they’ve been implemented to incentivize the occupancy of empty homes and the overwhelming majority of homes have people living in them.
You’re working under assumption most homes have people.living in them…
That is a 100% indisputably correct assumption. Vacancy taxes worked where they’ve been implemented to incentivize the occupancy of empty homes and the overwhelming majority of homes have people living in them.