Even back in the Windows 3.1 or 95 days I didn’t have to reboot this often - sometimes twice a day. Seems a bit excessive?

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    261 year ago

    I’m using the KDE version and updates come in automatically through Discover. They almost always announce in the system tray that a reboot is required.

    • frozen
      link
      fedilink
      631 year ago

      You also don’t have to reboot when Discover says to. It’s just saying that the updates won’t take effect until you reboot. It could probably be worded better, for sure.

      • Ocelot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        I think that installing new versions often means that particular services need to be restarted. Rather than implement logic to restart relevant services, it probably just says “fuck it, reboot”.

        • federalreverse-old
          link
          fedilink
          131 year ago

          Eh, no. It only downloads the packages, then asks you to reboot and installs the new packages during the boot process. This means you get a clean system afterward in which no pre-update binaries are being run anymore. It just comes at the price that you need a full reboot for something that usually needs a session relogin at worst.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        On the other hand you rather have to put a gun to the average GUI user’s head to get them to reboot ever, otherwise the computer will sit there for months on end until finally they shut it down once and it can finally apply updates.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      sigh… i hate to say it but do your updates via command line because it will actually tell you if you need a reboot. As said above, it should only be for Kernel updates, and even then it will tell you that it will switch kernels next reboot and keep running on the current one.

      Most desktop applications for doing updates ask you to reboot not because its needed, but because they are being “safe” or not running with the same user rights as you are in the terminal.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Why does no other distro do that though? I’ve tried a bunch before and this is the first time I get that notification sitting there taunting me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Hrm. Skim ahead if you already know some of this… So say you have a running program XYZ that loads libUseful.so to do useful things. Now you run some updates and libUseful.so gets replaced with the new version. Because of how files on Unix work, the old version still exists on the disk until XYZ closes it, but any new program will load the new version. So things generally “just work” when the system is updated in place, but on the rare occasion causes weird problems. Fedora (from the GUI) chooses to run updates during reboot to prevent the rare, weird problems. If you update from the command line, it just does them in place. Kernel updates always require a reboot to apply though.

        • Tobias Hunger
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          After applying an update you need to make sure anything using the unmatched code is replaced by the patched code. A reliable way to do that is a reboot. Actually a reboot is pretty much the only reliable way to do that.

          So I am not surprised that a distribution targeting end users asks for a reboot.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          It has been a while since I have used Fedora but this is not unique to that distro. Arch will also tell you to reboot if the kernel, systemd, and a few other packages are updated. I rarely do it right away though.

    • @Molecular0079
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      Do you have offline updates enabled in the Discover settings by any chance?