Roiland’s former fans and dates described disturbing interactions with the animator, with many playing out over texts. One woman said the ‘Rick and Morty’ creator sexually assaulted her, another said she was left ‘traumatized.’ (Warning: This article contains expclicit language.)

In the years following the 2013 debut of Adult Swim’s cartoon phenomenon “Rick and Morty,” its star and co-creator Justin Roiland became a titan of the animation and video game industry and a rock star of youth counterculture. His artistic style and caricatures became ubiquitous in cannabis culture, and his career expanded into producing other animated series, creating NFTs and leading a virtual reality gaming studio. In 2017, a “Rick and Morty” collaboration with McDonald’s led to such a viral frenzy that police had to be called to at least two locations.

But as he partied with Los Angeles’ superstars and traveled the country for conventions, he also found he could use his fame to strike up conversations and develop relationships with young fans, including some who were underage. This is according to interviews with 11 women and nonbinary people who shared thousands of messages with Roiland from 2013 to 2022 — with nine of the people saying he turned the exchanges sexual. Of those nine people, three said they were 16 when they started talking to Roiland. To corroborate their stories, the 11 women and nonbinary people also shared pictures, videos, social media posts, emails, and plane ticket and Uber receipts with NBC News.

Warning: Lengthy and graphic details

  • @dual_sport_dork
    55•10 months ago

    They totally do. By definition. What do you think the “statute” in “statutory” is referring to?

    • @Confuzzeled
      20•10 months ago

      Tshh it’s when you rape a statue silly.

      • @HeyThisIsntTheYMCA
        English
        4•10 months ago

        I think it’s Betrayal at House on the Hill where you lay out all the tiles to build the house, and one of them has permanently become the Statutory Corridor according to our house rules (because we’ve misread it so many times).

    • CMLVI
      -14•10 months ago

      I think you’re missing the double negative I used. Lol I’m saying that even if someone is above the age of consent, statutory rape is still an applicable charge.

      • @Cryophilia
        14•10 months ago

        By definition, it isn’t

        That’s the whole point of the law

        • CMLVI
          -1•10 months ago

          Take it up with Virginia; age of consent there is 15. Intercourse with a minor above 15 as an adult can still give you statutory rape charges, as referenced here: “The age of consent for intercourse is 15 years old in Virginia; however, there are other sex acts that set the age at 18. These acts include cunnilingus, fellatio, and anal intercourse, which means that minors cannot legally consent to certain sexual activity. Additionally, if you are an adult and have sex with a person under 18 years of age, you may be prosecuted for statutory rape. Statutory rape is generally charged as a Class 4 Felony, but the exact charge and penalties will depend on all the factors and ages involved.”

          Pulled from https://www.roanokecriminalattorney.com/how-does-virginia-define-consent/

          It isn’t always the case, generally age of consent precludes it, but not always. Age of consent isn’t a get out of jail free card. Additionally, it doesn’t specify about relations between people in positions of power.

          It’s all moot anyway, Roiland lives in CA, and he was inviting a 17 year old to his house in Los Angeles. Age of consent there is 18. Did he assault her? No, but what 36 year old man is inviting a 17 year old to his house? Multiple other reports of girls at 18, still in high school, also receiving advances from him.

          • @samus12345English
            6•10 months ago

            If there are exceptions then “age of consent” in Virginia doesn’t mean the same thing as it does in other states, so all this shows is that they’re re-defining the term.

            • CMLVI
              1•10 months ago

              I don’t think that tracks; I’ve always been under the impression that age of consent was just when you could consent to sexual activity. It didn’t account for age differences, power dynamics, or other factors that push it towards statutory rape. It was “at this age, they are able to consent to activity”, and then you would have the limiting factors of age difference, power imbalance, family, etc applied through other statutes.

              I very well could be wrong or just applying knowledge of my own local area to places that don’t operate that way, so I’ll bow out on that. I do know that age of consent isn’t just a blanket shield against statutory rape in some locales or situations, though. The “statutory” part of statutory rape isn’t limited to only age of consent.

              • @SheeEttinEnglish
                1•9 months ago

                “Statutory rape” just means rape by law, not necessarily by any kind of consent (since legally they can’t).

          • @SCB
            2•9 months ago

            These acts include cunnilingus, fellatio, and anal intercourse, which means that minors cannot legally consent to certain sexual activity

            These are anti-gay laws btw. That’s the entire purpose of these specific exceptions.

        • CMLVI
          0•10 months ago

          There is further conversation with another user below this, but that isn’t the case in some places, namely Virginia.

          Additionally, statutory rape isn’t just bound to age of consent. There are myriad other statutes it can apply through, namely family, age difference, and positions of power over minors above the age of consent.

          • @Serinus
            2•10 months ago

            The statutes (and therefore the term statutory) define the age of consent. Sometimes the age of consent can vary and isn’t as simple as one number.