On numerous occasions in post-Soviet Russia, conservative politicians and the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) have called for anti-abortion measures and the return of traditional gender roles. However, medical experts have defended accessible abortions, and no health minister has previously argued that women should prioritize childbirth over education in order to raise the birthrate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 year ago

    When they say traditional gender roles, they mean to enslave women. Fuck them conservatives.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Speaking of slavery, conscription of men to fight wars is another one of their “traditional gender roles”. If fact it seems to be the reason why they are restricting abortions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Enslave women as birth machines and men as fodder for the meat grinder. Everyone loses.

      Fuck putler and fuck his dumb fucking war.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -261 year ago

      Traditional gender roles guarantee a better natality. ( see amish, ultra ortodox jews, muslims ) , so progressive policies have no future in the long run due to demography issues. It is not an ideological analysis, but a tecnical one.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        The idea that having lots of kids is a good thing is definitely ideological. You might not have noticed but we have a few billion too many people on this planet, not too few.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          I’m not arguing if it is a good idea or not. I’m pointing the fact that high natality groups became majority in the long run and the majority dictate the policies.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            131 year ago

            That was certainly the case some of the time but if that was still true today you would expect groups like the Amish and Catholics to dominate populations while in reality they are very much in decline in terms of importance.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -21 year ago

              Amish is a group too far from society and catholics now have a very low tfr. On the other hand ultraortodox in israel and muslim in europe have a growing influence on society.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -11 year ago

                  Yes, the only one that have power and influence in the world are usa progressives from silicon valley… A quite very local point of view from a nation that define herself like a world power

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hey, how about we completely reverse the gender role? Maybe we can keep men for child rearing. Pretty sure that works too.

        • Jaysyn
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re discussing this with an Italian fascist, so that’s never going to happen in their narrow little mind.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Technical speaking, it is impossible. It is interesting that pointing an objective fact, i receive a lot of downvotes…

          North Korea too, has better tfr than south korea…