• @Freesoftwareenjoyer
    link
    English
    9
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Exactly. They would have to rewrite all the code in order to make it proprietary. AGPL license ensures that not even an instance owner can (legally) change the code of their own instance without releasing the modified source code.

    We need to make sure that any apps that are created for Lemmy, also have a Copyleft license. At the very least they should be Free Software (which doesn’t seem to be guaranteed sadly, since most people don’t know what that means).

    • @funkyb
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      “Created for Lemmy” isn’t really a thing, all you need is to implement the ActivityPub protocol. Whether or not it has any relationship to Lemmy has no bearing on if it can talk to instances using Lemmy’s implementation.

      • @Freesoftwareenjoyer
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        I see, but apps are already being created specifically for using Lemmy. Like Jerboa. So there must be a reason why people want to use them instead of using apps for Mastodon?

        • @AustralianSimon
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          Mastodon mobile apps and Lemmy mobile apps are not compatible with each other afaik. The Lemmy API is different to the Mastodon API. Their communication protocol between instances is ActivityPub.

        • @grue
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          I think what the other guy meant was more along the lines of pointing out that there’s no way to enforce that software interacting with Lemmy has to be copyleft.