• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    It seems like they believe they can be a gardener vs a farmer. That’s the only bit that I see that isn’t realistic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      In all likelihood they would be neither. With modern technology, we don’t need a large percent of the population farming. I realize communists typically eliminate the intellectuals and kulaks—those who would actually have useful knowledge—first, but the smart things would be to have the current farmers keep farming. You’d likely be assigned to a factory to manufacture widgets for the rest of your days.

        • Phoenixz
          link
          fedilink
          -21 year ago

          Eh, so do Communists but they just eliminated them on industrial scales.

        • @Zoboomafoo
          link
          -121 year ago

          I wonder if there’s a term for how the far right and the far left tend to be similar…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            There is but horseshoe theory is not well regarded in political science circles because it hasn’t held up.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Both can be offensively violent but the types of people drawn to either vary widely. For example I cannot say I know any socialists who were individually racist (as opposed to racist by virtue of being American as structural racism runs deep).

              Horseshoe theory is bullshit

            • Phoenixz
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              If I kill its because I’m defending myself, if you kill its because you are violent!

              Say both sides…

              Are you seriously trying to say that communist governments haven’t committed mass murder on an industrial scale just to fortify their power structures?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Which one is defensively violent? Hexbears said I should get nuked and they claim to exist on the left (they present as alt-righty if you ask me)

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  Well I don’t get threatened with nuclear annihilation everyday. I guess it was a weird one-off event (haha; I am being sarcastic).

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                You are unfamiliar with the altright if you think hexbear is at all right. They are leftists and many are revolutionary leftists but no one there for long is altright.

                For fucks sake this al, comes about from the ChapoTrapHouse subreddit getting banned.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  I see the world in a two dimensional way where people are placed into one of two camps based on a single characteristic;

                  Have they called for my death.

                  So I don’t give a shit what they (or anyone else) has to say about their political leanings. It’s all the same trash, and I lack the respect necessary to differentiate them.

                  So yea I say they’re alt right. If that upsets you, too bad.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -11 year ago

                    It just means you don’t know what the right is and are proud about that fact. It doesn’t upset anyone but why make obviously uninformed claims like that?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              defensively violent and authoritarian out of self-preservation

              LOL

              The irony here is that if you actually had two cows in the late 1920’s USSR you’d catch a bullet.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              No it’s a “theory” that has not been demonstrated to hold up and isn’t granted a lot of respect in political science circles.

              While certain aspects can be shared, such as a greater appreciation for authoritarianism, the actual beliefs are so incredibly different and the people drawn to them are so different that the “theory” doesn’t work.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -21 year ago

                I’m calling horseshoe theory holocaust trivialization. Well, I’m linking to a Jewish holocaust expert doing that.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  At what point does it discuss horseshoe theory? They seem to talk about the holocaust vs the soviets which isn’t really what horsehoe theory purports to be about (and again the horseshoe theory is complete bullshit)

      • R0cket_M00se
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        Assuming technology didn’t take a dive bomb that would be automated fairly quickly as well, look at how much robotics already does in manufacturing.

        Most people would be reassigned as IT and programmers, robotics technicians, etc. If it was actually done properly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          There’s already like 10 times as many programmers and whatnot then there need to be. Look at how many duplicates apps there are for everything.

          More likely they would be booted out as well

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            The system encourages those people to engage in the arms race for the next killer app to earn boatloads of money and win the game of capitalism. Finding people who are genuinely interested in maintaining the infrastructure that makes any of that possible is the problem.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Do they eliminate intellectuals? The USSR and China seem to have avoided this. I don’t believe most nations did this other than Cambodia and I will never see that shitshow as socialist.

        • bodgeit
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          USSR despised and fought the Intelligentsia, sending them to gulags

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          In the USSR it was kind of mixed. If you were at all associated with the old regime you were fucked but tbh a lot of them weren’t super sympathetic anyway.

          In China, lol. They fucking murdered everyone who knew anything and then suffered horribly for it. Of course, even then they might have been somewhat okay except Mao thought he knew better so they got the Great Leap Forward and stuff like the Four Pests campaign.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      -41 year ago

      And the part where they believe to have any freedoms whatsoever IS realistic? Or the part where they believe to actually be alive and not die in the next famine is realistic?

      I see very little realism here…