• Saik0
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    It will cost them in future earnings… Companies won’t want to work on their platform if these policies are still in place… and many will never want to work with them again since they’ve shown their hand.

      • @jarfil
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        The CEOs don’t need to be paid by other companies. All a competing company needs to do, is to convince some company’s board members to hire a CEO with a track record that they know will tank the company… maybe through indirect lobbying, maybe by hinting they want to hire them because it’s “such a valuable CEO”… and bam!

        CEO ruins company, then bails on a golden parachute, and you only had to spend whatever it took to mislead the competing board.

        (I’ve seen it done to tiny companies with as few as 20 workers, it’s surprisingly easy to convince a board to hire someone who will destroy everything)

          • @jarfil
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            To destroy the competition.

          • Ignisnex
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            Technically that’s what a board of directors is for. They are the ones who can axe a CEO and hire another.

              • Ignisnex
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                It’s good on paper, so long as a critical number of them aren’t bad actors. You kinda got the same problem with US politics at the moment. It works until it doesn’t, like everything else.