• Melllvar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -17
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Your comment comes off as shallow and dismissive. I’d be happy to discuss this further, but not under those conditions.

    • @BluetreefrogM
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      I thought @draghetta made a good point in way that wasn’t particularly shallow or dismissive. Not trying to stir hostility here, just throwing in my 2 currency subunits.

      • Melllvar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -51 year ago

        To clarify, I disagree because you’re both missing my point, which is to explain and help people understand, and not an argument put forward in justification of anything.

        Responding to an attempt to help bridge a gap of understanding by sarcastically dismissing any value in the analogy without even attempting to understand why it’s being offered is, to me, a dismissive and shallow thing to do.

        • @Pogbom
          link
          51 year ago

          What a shallow and dismissive thing to say

            • @Pogbom
              link
              81 year ago

              Addressing any of the points being made to you would be a great start. The first comment that you called shallow was a pretty good summary of why people support strict gun control, even if it was said sarcastically.

              • Melllvar
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Their point is that there are accidental and intentional, even mass, shootings. I don’t dispute this. I’m not even against reasonable gun control laws.

                But this was supposed to be a discussion about understanding an American perspective. Not sarcastically deriding any attempt to do so.

                • @Pogbom
                  link
                  21 year ago

                  So then it wasn’t shallow and dismissive at all, you just didn’t appreciate the delivery. The points they made were perfectly valid and, ironically, calling them shallow and dismissing was itself shallow and dismissive. It just seems more like you used a bad analogy but can’t take the criticism.