• @ProtonEvoker
    link
    English
    101 year ago

    No, in an exception based system like D&D, specific trumps general. There is a general rule in the DMG that states that you can’t bring someone back to life against their will; and since Revivify doesn’t specifically state that it is an exception to this rule, it isn’t.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -61 year ago

      Sure you can. Reincarnate specifies a willing soul, Revivify doesnt. Meaning you could revivify against their will. A costy tool but useful one for a torturer.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        Dungeon Master’s Guide p.24, Bringing Back the Dead:

        A soul can’t be returned to life if it doesn’t wish to be. A soul knows the name, alignment, and patron deity (if any) of the character attempting to revive it and might refuse to return on that basis.

        That’s the general rule for anything that brings the dead back to life. The spell needs to explicitly override this for it to work differently.

        Reincarnate doesn’t specify that the subject knows what form they’re coming back to, or that “reincarnate” is being used at all. So the subject doesn’t know that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -71 year ago

          So tell me. Why specify it in Reincarnate and not in Revivify then ?

          I also checked True resurection and it also specifies that the souls needs to be willing.

          The answer is this : WotC fucked up.

          But I agree, the DMG does says this. Buuuuut. Since some spells mentions willing souls and Revivify dont, I would say that this spell is so fast that the soul cannot decide since its probably still hanging around and so you could use it AT MY TABLE as a way to bring back a soul, willing or not.

          But RAW you are correct. Still gonna use it my way as long as everyone agrees at the table. Its not like its gonna break the game.