• @Cryophilia
    link
    -181 year ago

    I think reining them in is enough. We can habe billionaires in a green economy.

    I totally agree that billionaires should not exist, but I think climate change is more important and we shouldn’t lose sight of that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      221 year ago

      The average billionaire emits 1 million times more CO2 than the average 90%er. There are about 3000 of them

      • @Cryophilia
        link
        -101 year ago

        Yeah and it’s easier to transition to clean energy, mitigating their output, than it is to remove them.

          • @Cryophilia
            link
            -21 year ago

            Yeah but consider how difficult it is to remove them.

            • @Clent
              link
              21 year ago

              Difficult in what way?

                • @Clent
                  link
                  21 year ago

                  Yes. You just keep saying it’s difficult with no explanation.

                  • @Cryophilia
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    Well it’s a statement so obvious I hardly assumed it needed explaining. Have you ever thought about the practical aspect of removing billionaires? How exactly do you think it will happen? There are several methods and they’re all very difficult.

    • @VonCesaw
      link
      111 year ago

      You can’t reign them in when the reigns are for purchase You can’t prevent them from purchasing the reigns because when the price tag is big enough, everything is for sale You can’t stop them from purchasing reigns altogether because they’ll go to a different market who can, then force the market to be open to them They will do everything in their power to KEEP their power, and to prevent them from EVER LOSING their power There IS ONLY ONE WAY to stop billionaires from having power and it is to stop them from being billionaires in any way available