• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        241 year ago

        After promising safety in exchange for cooperation, and presumably without having convicted them of anything besides their former party affiliation?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            111 year ago

            Either trial him OR make a deal. You cant make a deal and after getting what you want proceed to trial him.

          • @_iamnotcutoutforthis
            link
            81 year ago

            What you’re suggesting is stooping to the level of the nazi cruelty by a complete breach of agreement even after the other party has fulfilled their terms. Also what was that pathetic attempt at baiting the other guy by saying: “aRe yOu SuGgEsTiNg iT iS wRoNg tO sHoOt NaZiS?!!”. Like that wasn’t even the point of the other guy.

      • DarkenLM
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        I think many of the scientists weren’t Nazis, but rather forced to work for the Nazis, fearing for their and their family’s lives. I could be wrong though, it has been a while since I’ve investigated that matter.

        • Skoobie
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          To be frank, it would be hard to siphon out truth from fiction at this point from personal accounts. That said, of course I distinguish between a forced Nazi accomplice and a sympathizer. I am not suggesting that they should be treated the same. I am suggesting that the U.S. was so zealous in its efforts to defeat the Russians that it wasn’t making distinctions.

          • @kameecoding
            link
            31 year ago

            didn’t Hitler get the idea of concentration camps from the US?

            I think you are idolizing US in this a bit too much, they weren’t exactly much better than the nazis.

            I mean I know for sure Eugenics were a popular idea in the US during that time, PoC were treated terribly etc.