• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    You made that point as if it were relevant or necessary. It’s insulting and simple-minded to believe that speaking out against prejudice is necessarily equivocation. And it’s frankly weird to support being prejudiced at all. And the lengths to which you fight for that view is gross, and you’re in bad company.

    • @magnusrufus
      link
      11 year ago

      Ok so it’s not that you don’t think there is a difference you just think that difference is irrelevant and that acknowledging that difference is supporting prejudice?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think you support being prejudiced as an acceptable moral premise, and you bring up equivocation in a weak attempt to justify it.

        • @magnusrufus
          link
          11 year ago

          Again I can’t tell if you are sincere or just fucking around again.

            • @magnusrufus
              link
              11 year ago

              Ok because before you were not being serious and it’s a pretty fine line between what you say when you are just fucking around and what you say when you are being serious.

                • @magnusrufus
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  And the support of bigotry thing is still you being sincere? Cause that’s in direct opposition to everything I’ve said so far.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    Naw, I was like, “boo bigotry,” and you were like, “Yeah, but it’s understandable in this case, and also, it’s worse for the Roma so I can’t believe you think they’re the same 🤓.”