• @theragu40
    link
    1001 year ago

    Why smoking remains so prevalent. I’m sure it’s not a majority that smokes, but it is massively more common anywhere I’ve been in Europe than here in the US. I live in a fairly large city and I will go many days in a row without seeing a single person smoking.

    I just don’t really get it. It’s gross, it smells, it ruins your teeth and your lungs, and it’s expensive. Why do it?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In my case, and this the US, I had friends who smoked.

      I was curious, bummed one, and once I got past the coughing I really enjoyed the effects, that said by the time you no longer get the “high” (for lack of a better word) you’re addicted.

      Fast forward 20 years and I’m still trying to quit.

      Quit for 5 years cold turkey, but… Shit went down in almost every facet of my life, and I went back.

      But I’m down to about a pack a week.

      One in the morning, one on the road to work, and one or two during my shift if time allows.

      Just need to kick it for good.

      Edit: To correct typos

      • RBG
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        Hey dude, I believe in you. You can do it again and do it for good! Don’t give up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      It’s not necessarily that smoking is a larger percentage of the population. It varies, but stats show a similar percentage more or less… it is a bit higher in Europe on average than in the US on average — but both places are large with varied amounts of smokers. It’s more that people are outside near each other more in Europe.

      https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/smoking-rates-by-country

      In Europe they’re walking down the street, sitting outdoors at cafes, hanging out in the city center, etc. Whereas in the US, people are often driving from place to place to go to a destination, so you don’t notice the smoking as much. Plus, smoking sections are a concept that exists in the US (even outside), whereas they don’t in Europe. Thankfully, in much of the US and EU, most places are finally non-smoking indoors now.

      This is a gross overgeneralization. It’s different in different parts of the US and different parts of Europe, of course.

      (FWIW: I totally agree with you that it’s gross. And it’s far too common to run into in Europe.)

    • @Pat12
      link
      161 year ago

      Why smoking remains so prevalent. I’m sure it’s not a majority that smokes, but it is massively more common anywhere I’ve been in Europe than here in the US. I live in a fairly large city and I will go many days in a row without seeing a single person smoking.

      I just don’t really get it. It’s gross, it smells, it ruins your teeth and your lungs, and it’s expensive. Why do it?

      this is the same in asia. sometimes people don’t even smoke, they just smoke because their boss does it and they do it to fit in at work. it’s really awful.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Not the case in northern Europe by the way. I’m just as shocked when visiting countries in mid/south Europe

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        It’s way too broad a comparison. In my North Eastern US state, encountering smokers isn’t that common because it’s illegal inside and anywhere near a door. So to smoke, you have to pretty much hide. And it’s become uncommon enough, smoking makes you a pariah so people seem to be breaking the official rules less often as time goes on due to social pressure more than fear of enforcement. We were out at a bar the other day and a guy smoked on the patio and it very much stood out. You could feel the vitriol for this guy in the atmosphere and after a minute he walked in to the parking lot looking embarrassed. Not that long ago a waitress would have brought him an ash tray.

        But go to Kentucky, there’s no rules about smoking anywhere. Last time I was there, we went to a grocery store with an ashtray between isles. Every building we went in to smelled like the 80s.

        These are both the USA. And then in Europe, you do have countries like Bulgaria, Turkey, and Greece where more than 25% of the country smokes, which is higher than anywhere in the US. But then you have Sweden with only 6% and Norway with 7% which is a little bit better than anywhere in the US.

    • KSP Atlas
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      It really depends on the area, in some places smoking isnt really normalized anymore, in some places its the norm

    • @SupraMario
      link
      61 year ago

      In the USA less than 9% of the population smokes now. It’s probably around ~7% at this point. It’s crazy that we keep putting out laws like it’s a massive issue. The reality is alcoholism is way worse than it’s ever been yet it’s still allowed to advertise on the TV and they can sell fruity flavors…but think of the children when it comes to tobacco…

      • @theragu40
        link
        191 year ago

        I’m hesitant to spin valid concerns about alcohol into de-vilification of smoking. They are both vices, both unhealthy, both dangerous to the user and those around them for different reasons.

        So yeah, it’s valid to say we ignore the dangers of alcohol. But also yes, we should “think of the children” when it comes to tobacco.

        • @SupraMario
          link
          21 year ago

          What kid is picking up coffin nails these days? They vape or drink. It’s probably why the FDA dropped deeming regulations when the cigar manufacturers went after them, no kid is smoking a $10 cigar.

          • @theragu40
            link
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That is threadbare justification for deregulation of something we know has basically entirely negative effects and absolutely is something that kids have historically done.

            Kids’ habits are fickle and unpredictable. Removing barriers to destructive behavior simply because they don’t do that behavior as often anymore (the current regulations seem to work??) makes no sense.

            • @SupraMario
              link
              -11 year ago

              The issue is they’re not just leaving them in place, they’re adding more regulations, while ignoring alcohol. More people are alcoholics now than ever, and everyone is completely fine with it, but smoking is taboo and “omg think of the children”.

              • @theragu40
                link
                21 year ago

                But… It’s still not bad that those smoking regulations are being put in place.

                It weakens the argument for additional alcohol regulation when you keep insisting that the regulations being put on another similar vice are pointless.

                • @SupraMario
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  How do you figure? Those of us who enjoy cigars/pipe tobacco/snuff are basically seeing our vices disappear because “think of the children”. Small makers are being forced to close because of the regulations on cigs. All while alcohol is completely allowed to do what it wants.

      • @GamingChairModel
        link
        111 year ago

        Well, the U.S. consumes a significant amount less alcohol than most European countries. So with both vices, Europe is doing worse than the U.S.

        • @SupraMario
          link
          -31 year ago

          Sure but both countries are pushing tobacco laws like mad, while not touching alcohol.

          It’s literally prohibition all over again…

          I’m one for letting people enjoy whatever vice they want, even if it’s hard drugs, but only because I know prohibition doesn’t work. We shouldn’t be telling adults what they can and cannot enjoy

          • @WhiteHawk
            link
            31 year ago

            Cigarettes are much worse for everyone around you than alcohol. Passive smoking is pretty dangerous and the main reason why so many laws exist against smoking in public places.

            • @SupraMario
              link
              -11 year ago

              No it is not, the 2nd hand studies where flawed heavily. Smoking is bad for you period, but second hand smoke is as bad for you as sitting in traffic. Alcohol is bad for people around you as well, lots of DUIs were people are harmed and killed because of it.

          • @dragonflyteaparty
            link
            11 year ago

            To an extent, I see where you’re coming from, but if we keep cigarettes legal, most of the additives need to go. There’s no need to put tar and acytone in a cigarette.

            • @SupraMario
              link
              01 year ago

              They don’t put those things in cigs. It’s a by product of burning tobacco. Those lists of whats in a cigarette are bullshit, it’s just the chemical reaction of burning something.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      There are laws against smoking in public places and cigarettes are expensive. Those who smoke are in it for themselves, not a European thing.

      • Kalash
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        It’s definitly a thing in some places. I travel a lot between Switzerland and Germany and the difference in how much public smoking there is, is quite extreme.

    • Alien Nathan Edward
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I’m not at a level of expertise where I can say for sure how much of an effect they’ve had, but part of the resolution of that lawsuit in the US where it was determined that the tobacco industry knew tobacco was addictive and caused cancer was that the industry had to establish a fund that was earmarked for anti-smoking advertisements. Those commercials by the Truth Initiative warning kids about the dangers of nicotine? At least partially funded by big tobacco.

    • Leraje
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -81 year ago

      I just don’t really get it. It’s gross, it smells, it ruins your teeth and your lungs, and it’s expensive. Why do it?

      All those things are true but are countered by the fact that it’s also fucking awesome.

  • @AndreaHill
    link
    961 year ago

    Why do they not want to go bankrupt from major health issues?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      77
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I was listening a podcast about cancer patient in France.

      One talk was about the fact that the surgeon was planning on removing the breast tumor AND do the reconstruction directly after.

      Except that by doing that the operation would have cost more than what the national social security covers, so it meant a big premium for the patient.

      The “big” premium they were taking about was 600€ which is obviously outrageous. To make a cancer patient spend this much money on a life saving procedure.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        521 year ago

        The “big” premium they were taking about was 600€ which is obviously outrageous. To make a cancer patient spend this much money on a life saving procedure.

        European here: I agree with this being outrageous. It’s not about the money, it’s about being a civilised society.

        Now hospital parking on the other hand…

    • aard
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      We do have some steep copayments for some treatments as well. For example, if I had to go to the hospital for a month I’d have to pay about 1000 EUR myself.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        281 year ago

        I was in the hospital for an outpatient procedure a couple of years ago here in the U.S. So not even overnight. I have good insurance. It cost me $2500.

      • @Cheems
        link
        101 year ago

        If I had to go into the hospital for a month, I truly would rather kill myself than have that shit looming over my for the rest of my life.

        • FartsWithAnAccent
          link
          English
          11
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The trick is: Just don’t pay these fuckers, what are they going to do? Show up and kill you?

          Maybe you get sued, but maybe they don’t even bother because it’s not worth the cost of lawyers.

          Either way, money isn’t worth dying for, even in a fucked up dystopian system.

          • @beefcat
            link
            151 year ago

            Except now you can’t buy a house or get a loan on a car because you have this massive outstanding debt…

            • @halferect
              link
              131 year ago

              Jokes on them I wouldn’t be able to buy a house or car that requires a loan anyways.

      • @NeoNachtwaechter
        link
        41 year ago

        hospital for a month I’d have to pay about 1000 EUR myself.

        300 here.

        • aard
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          I think that amount is way too high. Nowadays I could afford it without problems, but a few years back spending some time in hospital would’ve messed up my budget.

          I might be fine with paying for elective procedures - but hospital stays for other reasons should be covered by healthcare.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            91 year ago

            I agree it should all be free for non-elective procedures, but that’s pretty much the cost of a few hours at an American hospital. The fact I thought you were being sarcastic and were not really reinforces how messed up our healthcare system is

  • @crypticthree
    link
    901 year ago

    Monarchy. It’s the 21st Century and y’all still pay people to live a lavish lifestyle because they are distantly related to some warlord from the 9th century

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Then again, the people in all countries pay for the lifestyle of the politicians… in addition to the bribes they get for deciding in favor of whichever corporate and/or rich person needs a specific law passed or vetoed.

      At least the monarchs do what you pay them for … entertain you.

      • @ilickfrogs
        link
        71 year ago

        At least we can vote the politicians out. Fuck monarchies.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Politicians don’t do shit in America. Corporations govern the country and you can’t vote them out.

      • @ForgotAboutDre
        link
        71 year ago

        The King in the UK was caught with briefcases full of money declared as a ‘donation’. He has also interfered in our politics including encouraging the government to buy ineffective homeopathic ‘medicines’. They have also stopped the conviction of serious sex crimes royals have committed. Because the police get the power granted by royalty and can’t persecute them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I would be fine with it, if they were not allowed any other incomes during the time they get payed by the people.

          Oh and of course they should be forced to do their jobs. If they don’t fully attend sessions, cut their pay.

      • @crypticthree
        link
        10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nowhere in the question does it specify EU countries. It simply says European.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          You’re taking this too serious.

          I’m referencing crane driver Ronny in Norway (“Kranplätze müssen verdichtet sein!” : crane parking needs to be condensed (ground)), a reality TV icon in German language online communities and because the quote and context applies to both Norway and the UK which are both European, but not EU countries (that’s relevant because that’s part of the referenced joke), I posted that comment.

        • Turun
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Neither does your comment. So pointing out that “y’all” in this instance is not actually meant to be taken literally is worth pointing out.

      • @lugal
        link
        41 year ago

        SPEAK ANGLO-SAXON YOU SON OF A BITCH!

  • @forgotaboutlaye
    link
    741 year ago

    Specific to Germany, but when a second cashier opens up, it’s a first come first serve rush for it, rather than letting the person next inline at the original cashier take the first spot in the new one.

    • Zammy95
      link
      81 year ago

      Oh my god I love this. Let the chaos begin

      • @RGB3x3
        link
        281 year ago

        The Brits would never.

        Queuing is a national pastime.

        • @lars
          link
          21 year ago

          When I visit, I looooooove the civilized queues, but I can’t for the life of me understand why the slow lane on escalators is on the right (like you might find in big American cities) instead of the left (like you might find on a British highway).

    • @ChicoSuave
      link
      81 year ago

      Hun barbarism! Do Germans not know how to queue?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        From what I heard about queueing practices in Eastern Europe and Northern Asia, no, not at all. For example, a long-time queue doesn’t need people, it just needs some belongings queued.

  • @Mantis_Toboggan
    link
    611 year ago

    I belong to neither of these groups. But here goes it.

    Europe: when ordering water, I have to specify for it not to have gas (non-carbonated). Also in places like Germany, people drink those before playing football. I don’t understand how you do it or even like it that way.

    People in electric scooters are out of control. Specially in Spain. They’re the most egregious when it comes to disrespecting pedestrian crosswalks, dangerous overtaking in bike lanes and all around assholeness. You shouldn’t ride your fucking patinete in a train station crowded with people.

    — —-

    People from the US: Your tipping culture is out of control. It’s good for outstanding service on certain scenarios. But not for handing me takeout or pulling out a foamy beer from a cooler.

    Also , don’t tell newly-aquatinted people from the south that you’re not religious. They’ll try to tell you it’s their duty to save your soul and try to make you go to their religious services, which antagonizes them if you try to set boundaries on your personal beliefs.

    Btw. I still like you both.

  • @beefcat
    link
    51
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    • No ice in their water or soda
    • No refills on fountain drinks

    These are the things that stood out to me whenever I have visited.

    I spent a good while in Berlin once and one of my favorite restaurants was this Australian themed place by the IMAX theater just because I could get a nice big Diet Coke with ice in it. Their kangaroo sandwich also wasn’t half bad.

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        231 year ago

        The process of a soda fountain makes already it cold.

        Ice is completely pointless and without it you don’t need refills

        • @beefcat
          link
          21
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ice keeps the soda cold throughout your meal.

          In Europe my soda was often pretty close to room temperature by the time my food arrived. Not great if you like your beverages “ice cold”. But I get the impression Europeans don’t like their drinks as cold as we do in the US to begin with.

          We also use larger glassware in the US, which offsets much of the volume displaced by ice.

          So no, ice is not “completely pointless”, it’s just a cultural difference 🙂

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            larger glassware

            Thinking of a typical US fast food soda cup: understatement. For comparison, a German McDonald’s “Large” (the largest available) is 0.5 liters (17 oz). In the US, a “Medium” is 18 oz (0.53 l) or 21 oz (0.62 l) depending on who you ask, and, it goes to 30 (0.89 l) or 32 oz (0.95 l). And I’ve seen complaints that Wendy’s shrank their large from 40 oz (1.18 l) to 35 oz (1.04 l). That’s not a cup, that’s a bucket!

            A sit down restaurant in Europe will typically have soft drink serving sizes from 0.2 to 0.4 liters. The 0.2 is… unsatisfactory.

        • @GamingChairModel
          link
          21 year ago

          Ice holds it at 0°C though. For drinks that are delicious at 0°C but aren’t as good at 5°C, that ice makes a big difference, especially if you’ve got a cup that’s supposed to last 10+ minutes outdoors.

        • @joel_feila
          link
          11 year ago

          I drink 2 pitchers of tea with a meal. I will need refills with or with out ice in my glass.

          • rigatti
            link
            English
            91 year ago

            Have you considered that that may be a lot of tea?

          • @FooBarrington
            link
            51 year ago

            According to Google, 1 pitcher has a volume of 1.89 liters. If we assume they’re mostly full (1.8l), that would be 3.6l of tea. It’s recommended that you don’t drink more than roughly 1l per hour.

            You either eat very slowly, or you’re doing bad things to your body.

    • KSP Atlas
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      It’s a thing cause its not really as normalized, people don’t really drink enough to get free refills in some places (although many places have free refills) and people here are generally used to warmer colas, although many people and places do add ice

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Fountain drink: Depends on the restaurant. Some Burger Kings and McDs did have it, some removed it (probably exploited)

      I don’t want ice in my damn soda or ice.
      If you like it, ask the staff for some. They will usually give it to you.

      • @magnusrufus
        link
        91 year ago

        So dang euro you don’t even want ice in your ice.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I’m a fucking fiend for ice in my water, like I literally will fill the cup full of ice first, then put water in the space that’s left. When I visited Europe it was fucking rough getting used to never having ice. And if you asked for it (which I tried not to do, but I caved a few times) they’d give you like 3 cubes

      • Solivine
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        I absolutely hate ice in my drinks and have to always request it without or it gets added, this is in the UK

    • HamSwagwich
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Or the fact that you have to pay for fucking water. It’s a God damned human right but you have to pay the same for water as any other drink at restaurants in Europe. By the glass. And the glasses hold exactly one to two mouthfulls of water.

  • @floatingPoint
    link
    461 year ago

    I mean, it might just be a rumor but I hear that instead of being born with arms, Europeans are born with baguette extremities. They nibble on their baguette arms throughout the day, and they grow back while they’re sleeping.

    • Joe
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      We are not ruled by our monarchy. Their role is purely ceremonial. But yes they are of German descent.

      • @EverPresentPanda
        link
        141 year ago

        It’s ceremonial only by convention. Most of the monarchy’s power still legally exists, which to me is ridiculous

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Nothing! Because they already use that power, just not in public. They blatantly exercise their powers to extort judges/politicians/media to their benefit.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They’d be deposed, obviously. Thing is, the very act of deposing them would be an extralegal action, as all laws in the UK are established under the crowns authority. Legally speaking it would be the equivalent of a non-violent coup. Hence ceremonial by convention(de facto), rather than by law(de jure).

          • @EverPresentPanda
            link
            11 year ago

            There would definitely be a huge backlash. But also a very vocal minority who would probably support them. The end result would be some long overdue changes to our constitutional setup, but given the current state of UK politics, this would be delivered at the end of a highly polarising and disruptive period (I’m thinking Brexit vote level of rancour).

            Would be better if we just nipped this in the bud now. Remove the monarchy’s constitutional power, and make them fund themselves with their huge existing wealth. They can keep the titles and ceremonies for all I care, just pay for it themselves

          • @EverPresentPanda
            link
            11 year ago

            Every new law passed is signed off by the monarch, a new PM still has to ask royal permission to form a government etc. In practice, these are purely formalities and are treated as such, but still legally there

    • @drivepiler
      link
      61 year ago

      Not that uncommon tbh, in Norway our monarchs are of Danish descent.

      • Fonzie!
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        We (NL) have distantly German monarchs. Currently half our Royal Pair is from 🇦🇷 Argentina, which is neat.

    • @Darthjaffacake
      link
      21 year ago

      What annoys me more is that they’re British (/j). But nah they’re hardly foreign it’s just like their grandad or great grandad, you could make an equal claim that trump is German I think (off the top of my head).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        They belong(ed) to the german royal house “Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha” and changed their name to “Windsor” after WW1 to not be affiliated with germany anymore. I don’t know if that’s enough to call them foreign though.

  • @Th3D3k0y
    link
    351 year ago

    I met up for lunch with a buddy and his partner who was visiting from Europe. I mentioned that I drink a lot of water and asked for a refill, they asked if water was free.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      Typically they ask you for still or sparkling while dining and they charge in Europe. In London, I typically just say, “tap”. They had to legally serve it.

      • KSP Atlas
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Yeah, tap water is something you can ask for basically everywhere and its free, bonus if it’s in a place with amazing tap water

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      It depends on the country, in Greece it’s usually free, maybe in touristy places or if you order bottled water you will be charged, but otherwise most places will give you cold tap water for free.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        I think it’s legally required to give tap water for free mostly everywhere, but if you don’t specify it they might sneak in an outrageously expensive bottle of mineral water, it’s basically a way to scam tourists.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          In Italy they don’t, Italians are weird like that. It’s also a country where nearly everyone doesn’t trust their tap water and buy water in plastic bottles…

  • @Salad_Fries
    link
    301 year ago

    I know that a short visit doesnt give great insight into a place, but the following 2 things were very striking to me when visiting:

    1 - the smoking… i found it disturbing just how many people were smoking 2 - the graffiti. I was surprised by just how much graffiti there was. Do people not take pride in their property enough to wash it off? I know Graffiti is common everywhere, but it seemed to be on a whole other level in europe… like it wasnt just on the back alleys, but on the front facades of buildings too. The front door of one of my airbnbs was covered in graffiti.

    There was 1 thing though that was totally the opposite though & made total sense… the dual function windows (where you turn the handle 1 way to open them like a door & another way to lean them in to provide ventilation. These were everywhere & i found them to be the most functional thing ever! I wish they would catch on in the usa… with that said, the first time i discovered this functionality, it was accidental. I panicked as i thought i broke the window lol.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      231 year ago

      The graffiti thing kills me. Washing it off is a waste, it will be vandalised again quickly. Think this way, repaint properly a wall takes time and money, to draw a cartoonishly large cock takes seconds and costs pennies. So many places chose to allow selected artists do some good stuff as it’s a better deterrent.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      The smoking absolutely kills me, as someone with asthma who has gotten very used to the fact that most things in the US are non-smoking now. It felt like there was a cloud of smoke basically everywhere I went in France and, to a lesser extent, England.

  • Throwaway
    link
    fedilink
    271 year ago

    No disabled access almost everywhere, even in newer buildings.

    • @qooqie
      link
      141 year ago

      This is one thing I think America has done right, the ADA is so nice for people with disabilities. I want everyone to be able to experience everything so having the ADA being strong is perfectly okay with me. And I think both sides agree, everyone will get old someday!

      • @fubo
        link
        21 year ago

        Bear in mind, this is relatively recent in the US too. It’s culturally connected with both the civil rights movement of the 1950s-1960s, and to the respect that Americans (sometimes) express for war veterans.

    • KSP Atlas
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      This really depends on the place, but yeah some places have pretty awful mobility, like there’s a path next to my house with stairs and no ramp on it

    • RaivoKulli
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Inwinder where in Europe it’s like this. Where I’ve been most places are accessible

  • Call me Lenny/Leni
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    It largely depends on the European nation. Even as a non-native, I don’t tend to lump them all in one judgment, just as Europeans shouldn’t lump all Americans in one judgment. Every American state is different. Reply to this comment with a European country and I’ll share the thing about it that I understand the least.

        • @macrocephalic
          link
          51 year ago

          You don’t understand drugs? I think it’s understandable to be against drugs, but I thought you’d be able to understand them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Mah, drugs makes sense to me. We have a more open policy. You can get your xtc freely tested by the gov so you dont take weird shit, shroom growing kits are legal and so are weak shrooms, truffles. Which can be bought in a certain store.

          And except for weed that is really were it stops though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Might be where it stops legally but availability/quality of all drugs in NL is clearly above the neighbours.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Idk im pretty against war on drugs etc. And believe that people just need mental support for them not to get addicted.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Oh me too, decriminalise everything! Just saying NL definitely has better/more accessible drugs, also the illegal stuff.

      • Iron Lynx
        link
        61 year ago

        As a Dutch person, a bit off topic, but some truth in television that I found funny:

        The Belgians’ relationship with fries.

        Last summer I was at a former military camp in the German hills, managed by Belgium when it was still operational, and we had a Belgian tour guide who’d served in the camp when it was active. He joked that the Belgian conscripts serving in that camp still got fries thrice a week, or they’d have a riot.

      • Call me Lenny/Leni
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        The lack of a feeling of equal opportunity the secessionists all have for each other. If one group has the right to leave, I’d think all do.

    • KSP Atlas
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      That’s what I’m saying, the UK and Bosnia for example are very different places

      • Call me Lenny/Leni
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        The thing I understood the least about the Czechlands is why Czechoslovakia didn’t have one identity (for a lack of a better way to put it). Like it always seemed like a compound of two places, as opposed to a singular distinct body.

  • @AndreaHill
    link
    211 year ago

    How do they put up with the lack of mass shootings ?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Growing up without the adrenaline rush when crossing school’s gates is indeed a tragedy. Heckin boring

    • BigFig
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      Yeah wheres the excitement

    • @j4k3
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      It’s like the abortion lottery with the most corrupted poor States working hard to enslave women’s bodies to their institutionalized meat lottery of school shootings and miserable impoverished existence all to feed the insatiable appetite of the parasitic billionaires. How can those Europeans really live without getting to experience the Grand Republican Hunger Games.

  • JWayn596
    link
    181 year ago

    Self defense laws are pretty weird in Europe. I am spoiled on our second amendment laws, so let my bias be noted.

    However, some guy can break into your house and if you defend yourself with a bat or knife, the laws there from what I hear (this isn’t fact, I could be mistaken) can get you in trouble with the law. I remember reading that somewhere.

    Sure it’s like that in the US too but there are many protections for those who clearly have acted in self defense.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      461 year ago

      I think the difference is welf defense in Europe is defending your person, not your property. If someone breaks in, you don’t have the right to hurt them. You call the police. If they were trying to attack you or you alerting them to your presence makes them come for you, then of course you can defend yourself.

      Self defence is just that. Defence of the self.

      One thing that your 2a right also means is that your criminals are likely to be armed. Ours are less likely to be and certainly much less likely for petty crime. The police in Ireland, for instanc, don’t carry guns.

      If someone breaks into my house. I’m not approaching them with hugs. I’m calling the police and grabbing a golf club or poker or similar.

      • @shalafi
        link
        111 year ago

        This guy is extremely conservative and a former cop. (He doesn’t fly his politics, but you can tell.) He has testified in dozens of deadly force trials as an expert witness. Here’s what he has to say about defending property. Very eye opening.

        “In the anti-gun Spokane newspaper, internet comments indicated that many people had the clueless idea that Gerlach had shot the man – in the back – to stop the thief from stealing his car. One idiot wrote in defense of doing such, “That ‘inert property’ as you call it represents a significant part of a man’s life. Stealing it is the same as stealing a part of his life. Part of my life is far more important than all of a thief’s life.”

        Analyze that statement. The world revolves around this speaker so much that a bit of his life spent earning an expensive object is worth “all of (another man’s) life.” Never forget that, in this country, human life is seen by the courts as having a higher value than what those courts call “mere property,” even if you’re shooting the most incorrigible lifelong thief to keep him from stealing the Hope Diamond. A principle of our law is also that the evil man has the same rights as a good man. Here we have yet another case of a person dangerously confusing “how he thinks things ought to be” with “how things actually are.”

        As a rule of thumb, American law does not justify the use of deadly force to protect what the courts have called “mere property.” In the rare jurisdiction that does appear to allow this, ask yourself how the following words would resonate with a jury when uttered by plaintiff’s counsel in closing argument: “Ladies and gentlemen, the defendant has admitted that he killed the deceased over property. How much difference is there in your hearts between the man who kills another to steal that man’s property, and one who kills another to maintain possession of his own? Either way, he ended a human life for mere property!” ― Massad Ayoob, Deadly Force - Understanding Your Right To Self Defense

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      281 year ago

      Self defense is of course allowed, but only so far as to prevent harm. It also needs to be adequate to prevent the harm the attacker tried to inflict. So shooting someone who entered isn’t okay, you could’ve just held the gun at them. Which isn’t relevant cause you don’t have a gun and neither do they, most likely.

    • @shalafi
      link
      51 year ago

      Same bias as yourself. I find it stunning that the British police are so proud of the pocketknives they confiscate.

  • Melllvar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    Why some of them seem downright gleeful about every American shortcoming or perceived shortcoming.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I consider Americans like distant cousins. Not as closely related as neighbouring countries but still part of the family.

      • @ChicoSuave
        link
        31 year ago

        Nah, just the loud idiots who get all the attention. Most of us realize how unspecial we are in the grand scheme of things.