it’s the most expensive to build/operate and much safer than typically perceived. Accidents are spectacular and rare.

  • @thonofpy
    link
    29 months ago

    I see a difference regarding the effects if something does go wrong. A plane crash is no Fukushima.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      19 months ago

      sure, a plane crash typically kills everyone aboard. The explosion and resulting leak at Fukushima killed no one.

      they’re obviously not exactly the same, but similar in certain respects

      • @thonofpy
        link
        19 months ago

        Didn’t know that, but you are right, nobody actually died directly from radiation related causes at Fukushima. However, deaths from circumstances relating to the evacuation of the area are estimated to be in the thousands (source: wikipedia). I find that that somewhat illustrates the extent to which human lives have been impacted. While a plane crash is a personal tragedy for a number of people and relatives, a nuclear accident feels more like a collective catastrophe.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It’s not clear to me that these deaths from evacuation are from the explosion at the plant and resulting leak or the most powerful earthquake ever recorded in Japan (mag 9.0) and resulting tsunami. it’s really hard to pin a definitive reason onto these fatalities.

          • @thonofpy
            link
            29 months ago

            Fair point. Nuclear plants are fairly safe and historically have a low death toll, I agree. Leaves the radioactive waste to deal with.