The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

    • @SCB
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      No I’m looking at this the way a lawyer does.

      You know, like for court.

        • @SCB
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          That you think I am defending the people using Fry’s voice here is just further confirmation that you don’t understand what I’m saying.

          I’m saying there aren’t laws or standards that accurately restrict this usage, and that is a bad thing and why people are upset.

            • @SCB
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              Here is current precedent:

              This isn’t the first time technology and copyright law have crashed into each other. Google successfully defended itself against a lawsuit by arguing that transformative use allowed for the scraping of text from books to create its search engine, and for the time being, this decision remains precedential.

              Please explain, in your view, the substantive differences.

              Quote from here: https://hbr.org/2023/04/generative-ai-has-an-intellectual-property-problem

                • @SCB
                  link
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The AI doesn’t scrape words, in context. It scrapes morphemes and pieces them together. That’s how voice AI works. I work with voice AI as part of my job, and learning to feed it morphemes instead of full words is often important, because the AI trips up on some of its inflections.

                  It’s weird that you still think I’m defending this usage after this many posts. What are you missing?