The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

  • @_number8_
    link
    English
    141 year ago

    AI is very stupid and breaks in ways you wouldn’t expect

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -61 year ago

      Some AIs are more intelligent than the average person.

      Ask a normal person to do the tasks ChatGPT can and I bet the results would be even worse.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Ask chatGPT to do things a normal person can, and it also fails. ChatGPT is a tool, a particularly dangerous swiss army chainsaw.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -41 year ago

          I use it all the time at work.

          Getting it to summerize articles is a really useful way to use it.

          It’s also great at explaining concepts.

          • @abbotsbury
            link
            English
            101 year ago

            It’s also great at explaining concepts.

            Is it? Or is it just great at making you think that? I’ve seen many ChatGPT outputs “explaining” something I’m knowledgeable of and it being deliriously wrong.

            • @gedaliyah
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              I agree. I have a very specialized knowledge in certain areas, and when I’ve tried to use chat GPT to supplement my work, it often misses key points or gets them completely wrong. If it can’t process the information, it will err on the side of creating an answer whether it is correct or not, and whether it is real or not. The creators call this “hallucination.”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -21 year ago

              Yeah it is if you prompt it correctly.

              I basically use it instead of reading the docs when learning new programming languages and Frameworks.

              • @abbotsbury
                link
                English
                41 year ago

                That’s great, it works until it doesn’t and you won’t know when unless you already are knowledgeable from a real source.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  You know it doesn’t work when you try and tell it doesn’t work and it’ll usually correct itself.

              • nickwitha_k (he/him)
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                A coworker tried to use it with a well-established Python library and it responded with a solution involving a Class that did not exist.

                LLMs can be useful tools but, be careful in trusting them too much - they are great at what I’d say is best described as “bullshitting”. It’s not even “trust but verify” it’s more “be skeptical of anything that it says”. I’d encourage you to actually read the docs, especially those for libraries as it will give you a deeper understanding of what’s actually happening and make debugging and innovating easier.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  Ive had no problem using them. The more specific you get the more likely they are to do that. You just have to learn how to use them.

                  I use them daily for refactoring and things like that without issue.