Let’s put some life into this sub. I don’t think degrowth is possible under capitalism because the imperative to degrow contradicts the capitalist drive for the creation of value (valorization) which must always grow under capitalism’

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    If I may enter the discussion. I think it’s very very hard but may be possible. Let’s say people only buy new things when it’s something they need and the things itself should work for a long time, like generations. It reduces consumerism, things would only be replaced if something greatly superior appeared. Some things would still be bought so there is still some capitalism but wouldnt be focused on mindless spending in junk. Things would be more expensive but overall we’d have better things.

        • Edmond Dantesk
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Maybe if everyone had access to roughly the same wealth, market economy could be a good method of balancing economy ?

            • Edmond Dantesk
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              True. But there has been experiments, especially around melting currencies (is that the correct English name ?).

              A recent example (in French, but I guess automatic translators are good enough now ?) : https://monnaie-libre.fr/

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Thank you for that, I wasn’t aware that was a thing! I’ll bookmark that to read later as it seems a bit long! I didn’t even know melting currencies were a thing

                • Edmond Dantesk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  Such is the power of economic orthodoxy - to trick you into thinking there is no alternative, that economic laws are laws of nature when they are “only” social constructions …