If top of the society is immoral psychopaths with power, and most of the society is composed of people with good intentions, then there is not much hope for “beta uprising” until things go way beyond point of recovery, because powerful psychopaths will not let their power get taken away.

Not sure if this is just evolutionary biology, but this cycle of psychopaths at the top has been going on since when, at least ancient Egypt. And in all these thousands of years, the system that enables this cycle got way more reinforced than it got dismantled.

So is it maybe better idea to put benevolent people’s energy towards designing and preparing a new societal system that will have built-in mechanisms for preventing corruption and malevolence? “prepare” as in get ready to implement for when the current messed up system is about to grind to a halt and collapse? Well, it would be best to figure out how to go full Benevolent Theseus™ by replacing parts of currently failing system with the corruption-proof ones.

What are some resources related to this topic? Recearch on societal dynamics, designing political systems, examples of similar revolutions that already happened, etc. Post any links that you consider relevant

  • @redempt
    link
    01 year ago

    going vegan doesn’t help animals much either. we live in an overproductive society that wastes most of what it produces anyways - even if your personal choice marginally reduces demand, the abuse is ongoing. we need systemic solutions. we need to destroy the meat industry. veganism will never be popular enough to create systemic change on its own.

    • @kaj
      link
      11 year ago

      How do you plan to destroy the meat industry without anyone going vegan? You realize the meat industry is funded by non-vegans, right? And tax payers, of course, who also eat meat and won’t support policy that challenges their freedom.

      • @Wogi
        link
        11 year ago

        Destroying the meat industry isn’t going to have the beneficial impact you think it will.

        Most of the food we grow we can’t eat, most of the farmland we use exclusively to support livestock isn’t suitable for anything else. These animals are eating food that is otherwise biological waste that will simply decay and contribute to carbon emissions.

        I’m not saying there isn’t room for improvement, I am saying elimination isn’t improvement, it only creates more problems.

        This sets aside the problems created by eliminating animal fat and protein from our collective diet, which causes a health and nutrition problem on top of a pretty significant caloric deficit that again, we don’t necessarily have the agricultural land to replace.

        If being vegan is your jam then more power to you, but it isn’t the answer for society’s problems.

        • @kaj
          link
          01 year ago

          While animals can eat waste from crops grown for humans, that’s a minority of their feed. Almost all new corn and soy cropland is cut to meet growing animal agriculture demand.

          How does eliminating animal fat and protein cause health and nutrition problems? Humans are perfectly capable of living on vegan diets at all stages of life.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            animals can eat waste from crops grown for humans, that’s a minority of their feed.

            about 85% of the of the global soy crop is pressed for oil, and the industrial waste from that process is the vast majority if what is fed to animals. only 7% of the global soy crop goes directly to animals. ruminants live almost entirely on grass, even if they are grain finished.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            How does eliminating animal fat and protein cause health and nutrition problems? Humans are perfectly capable of living on vegan diets at all stages of life

            every paper i’ve ever read about it spends the bulk of the paper explaining the risks and giving ways to mitigate them.