• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    Has anyone here seen this version? Does graphic novelization mean it’s graphic as in nsfw? The unedited diary does have a lot of sexual content. If it’s just a different version of the book though, that’s way overreacting.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        341 year ago

        She is fairly scientific in her descriptions. Doesn’t seem like a problem to me. Any health class should be covering this anyways.

        • @teruma
          link
          201 year ago

          You know they’re not in Texas…

      • @samus12345
        link
        English
        161 year ago

        She would have been mortified to know that this was going to be published for all the world to see in the future!

        • @teruma
          link
          131 year ago

          Didn’t her father previously withhold these pages, and didn’t allow them to be published until later?

          • @samus12345
            link
            English
            111 year ago

            I looked it up and it looks like you’re correct, this wasn’t published until 1995. Which explains why I’d never seen it before.

            • @teruma
              link
              41 year ago

              I didn’t realize it was that much later

            • @abbotsbury
              link
              31 year ago

              Are there any ways to tell if a version is abridged or not?

    • 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚐
      link
      -6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I would assume the accusation and headline would be much different if there was any kind of direct link to support a claim involving Jewry, CSAM, and public grooming.

      Edit: grammar

          • JokeDeity
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            Then I’m further confused as to why it’s listed along-side child porn and child grooming?

            • 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚐
              link
              8
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The Diary of Anne Frank was written by a Jewish girl during the Nazi occupation of the Netherlands.

              There are unabridged entries in her diary in which she wrote about going through puberty and made certain specific observations about her maturing body.

              OP made reference to these entries and wondered if they happened to be in this adaption:

              Has anyone here seen this version? Does graphic novelization mean it’s graphic as in nsfw? The unedited diary does have a lot of sexual content.

              Hence my reply.

              If these were included in the adaption, there would be accusations of CSAM (graphical depictions of an underage girl exploring her body), public grooming (teaching kids that this is acceptable), and it would be aimed pointedly at Jewry (the Jewish people).

              Edit: grammar

      • @Gabu
        link
        31 year ago

        I think this user was misinterpreted (as I misinterpreted it myself, originally). They’re claiming that the outcry, should legitimate issues be present, would have a different wording.

        • 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚐
          link
          41 year ago

          They’re claiming that the outcry, should legitimate issues be present, would have a different wording.

          Thank you, this is the correct interpretation.