John Grisham, Jodi Picoult and George R

John Grisham, George R.R. Martin and more authors sue OpenAI for copyright infringement::John Grisham, Jodi Picoult and George R

  • @NahviEnglish
    3•1 year ago

    Thank you for the response. I am not sure I agree with your exact stance, but you make several compelling points along the way.

    Using the Fair Use doctrine is definitely a good way to narrow down where the dividing line is. I think we can easily agree that making a GRRM specific AI to make derivative, non-parody, commercial works would definitely be on the wrong side of the line.

    When I was picturing the bots, I was picturing something more along the lines of AI bots that had consumed all human literary works, or at the very least all modern English literary works.

    ChatGPT write me a short story where the Main Character is a Magical Golem that follows the Three Laws of Isaac Asimov. It should be written in the style of a Greek Tragedy but set in Feudal Japan. The Main Character should be able to gain in magical power until he eventually attempts to break into the Heavens. There should be gods trying to interfere in his ascension but not in ways the MC cannot resolve. Base the gods off of archetypes from Norse Mythology, but name them after characters from GRRM’s game of thrones based on similar personality types.

    Such a work would both be wholly derivative and yet wholly unique. Despite swiping GRRM’s unique names this work should be perfectly fine in my mind. Edit: Even if it was commercialized.

    • @FireTowerEnglish
      4•1 year ago

      I see what you’re getting at but I feel that once we get past the GRRM specific example some of the same issues still remain.

      For example if it was instead a GRRM & JK Rowling and wrote in a style of the two in my eyes it hasn’t escaped the problem of the GRRM AI it’s compounded them by adding one more author who’s works is being used. Then we could extrapolate that out to it’s true scale where it uses most written literature (although some presumably pub domain).

      I just see it as if doing it to one person’s work is wrong doing to two people’s work aught to be twice as bad.