• rhythmisaprancer
    link
    fedilink
    09 months ago

    Maybe you don’t like the mouthpiece, but it is just regurgitating information from a journal. You can find similar research reported in other journals. You clearly don’t like it, but that doesn’t make it bullshit.

    Optimism and naivety are not too far apart. Often it is just from one’s point of view.

    • Dr. Dabbles
      link
      English
      19 months ago

      Yes, we’ve had similar nonsense copied from a published corporate “paper” for years now. It’s garbage. Not even hot garbage. Because it’s bullshit.

      You do know that bullshit gets published constantly, right? And that the rate of published bullshit in the greenwashing spaces has increased massively so these companies can grift people that aren’t critical enough to see it for the BS it is?

      • rhythmisaprancer
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        I’m aware there are issues with science journals, but even ones ostensibly more trustworthy cover this type of battery more recently than 10 years ago. And being critical can be hard for anyone (such as me) who is objectively not a scientist and is not an expert in this field. I, and probably nearly all people here, can benefit from discourse in this setting. There is essentially nobody doing that tho.