• Kalash
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    MS is the last hope to safe some of the classic Blizzard titles as the state of Activision Blizzard as it is simply can’t get any worse.

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      English
      141 year ago

      Why? As in, why are they “the last hope”? What can they do that ActiBlizzKing cannot?

      • Kalash
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        What can they do that ActiBlizzKing cannot?

        Literally anything.

        There is currently a handful of devs doing the occational balance patch for SC2 otherwise the game is complelty dead from the developer side. On the MS side, AoE2 and other even older games are doing so much better.

        • @echo64
          link
          English
          101 year ago

          … that game came out 13 years ago and was supported with expansions for 6 years

          • Kalash
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And AoE2 came out 24 years ago and is supported with expansions to this day.

            • Carighan Maconar
              link
              English
              81 year ago

              And SS1 came out 29 years ago and just got a remaster. This isn’t a years-pissing context. Starcraft II was supported way long, and extensively. And like all good games, eventually the vast vast majority of players have moved on, and then the devs might move on, too.

              • Kalash
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The issue is not not players of devs, but the management that probably doesn’t think it’s profitable enough anymore. Yet, Microsoft manages to keep AoE2 going with an even smaller playerbase than SC2.

                So MS taking over an abandon francise I care about sounds pretty sweet to me.

            • AnonTwo
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Isn’t the expansion content between SCII’s expansions and AoE2’s expansions significantly different?

              EDIT: the last one was 3 races (note: races are significantly less diverse in AoE2 vs in SC2) and 3 campaigns, each with 6 maps each

              I feel like the Co-OP commanders they added fairly frequently would constitute roughly the same amount of race content. Campaign content not so much but the main campaign of each SC2 expansion is 26 stages, not including branching paths.

              • Kalash
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Not that much. Yes, AoE2 usually adds new factions, that won’t happen in StarCraft II. But introducing new units or reworking existing one is possible.

                Adding singleplayer mission is pretty mich the same.

                Also the Co-op mode of SC2 is quite popular and there is room to add a “new factions” there.

                • AnonTwo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  No they’re VERY different from what I checked. I’m not sure how you could possibly say “not that much” to that!

            • @echo64
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Comparing one thing to an exception is dumb in the best of times

              • Kalash
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Doesn’t matter. The option to pay for some more content is literally what I’m hopeing for.

                • yes it does matter. These are businesses. They make money by selling things. You cannot compare one rereleasing the same game with minimal changes for new money to keep supporting an existing game without charging new money.

                  • Kalash
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    It doesn’t to me. They can re-release the game with an updated engine or just add more content via DLCs and expansions, I’ll take either.

        • Neato
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Why would they do that? CoD is a better investment. This is MS. Not some fan boy.

              • @NOT_RICK
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                If the games are good and non-exploitative it would in theory drive up Game Pass subscriptions.

        • Carighan Maconar
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          They would just contract Blizzard to make that, so if they were able to do it they would have done so already.

        • @CynicRaven
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          I haven’t played it but I have read that Diablo 4 has been mostly well received. I guess there’s been a fiasco about one of the updates to it, but that’s not something unique to Blizzard and theoretically could be fixed in another update, no?