• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -151 year ago

    Maybe the internet being built on links is a problem?

    You could run the same argument for ads and tracking

    • @NarrativeBear
      link
      231 year ago

      I’m not entirely sure how one could create a internet of interconnected computers and servers without links to one another and the webpages they serve.

      Short of maybe making one “central hub” controlled by one state/entity. Though this would probably not turn out great.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Short of maybe making one “central hub” controlled by one state/entity. Though this would probably not turn out great

        I think public search engines is a good idea though it would be multiple states

        I suppose it’s because I’m old so I don’t like how centralized and profit driven the internet has become but I see nothing wrong with profit sharing with websites on pages where their link is used

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I see nothing wrong with profit sharing with websites on pages where their link is used

          It’s just strange when the law gets involved to carve out weird special cases for special interests.

          If site operators don’t want incoming connections to their systems without having record of payment received from a referring party, they can simply deny the request. Hell, put up a big red notice that says “You are not permitted to access this website because the place from whence you came refuses to pay for your access. Please encourage them to do so to help fund our wonderful content!” for all anyone cares.

          This is all perfectly negotiable through boring old contract law that has been around forever.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I see the law as a step not the end and would rather further the reaches of the legislation than repeal it

            As per blocking referrals I feel the issue is more the title and blurb stops people from clicking through as is. Hence the legislation

            If Facebook wasn’t allowed to show more than just a link then they would react in a similar manner

            Lemmy has a similar issue of people only reading the title or what the person said about a link

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If Facebook wasn’t allowed to show more than just a link then they would react in a similar manner

              Funny thing is that Facebook gave publishers what they call Open Graph many years ago to allow them exacting control over what the links entail. All of Canada’s major publications have adopted Open Graph. If you are seeing more than just a link, it is because the publication has explicitly given more information to Facebook to use.

              If you don’t want Facebook to have that information… maybe don’t provide it?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  If said posting fell under fair use there is little the publication can do, but that’s on purpose! We created fair use laws specifically to allow that behaviour. If that is not what we want anymore, logically we would revert the law, not come up with all kinds of weird and contrived bandaids to help only special friends.

                  If the post fell short of fair use, the publication would have the legal right to seek penalization for the person who posted the content. It would also be a violation of Facebook’s terms of service. In this case, the answer to your question is essentially yes. It cannot be prevented, per se, but corrective action can be taken – which also serves to dissuade others from doing the same in the future.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not entirely sure how one could create a internet of interconnected computers and servers without links to one another

        One could always look at the history books, I guess. It is believed that the first real-world use of hyperlinks on the internet took place in 1991. It is also believed that the Internet as we know it was born in 1983. That means we lived through eight actual years of this “unimaginable” internet.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          aha the internet as you know it was not born in 1983 unless you are mostly interacting on lemmy with email and ftp

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Lemmy – or what was originally known as Usenet – was created in 1979. It predates the internet as we know it.

            Not sure where you think email and FTP come into play. Usenet began with UUCP and later NNTP.

            • ram
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              Lemmy was never known as Usenet.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It is the NiH syndrome attempt to recreate Usenet all over again. One would think the audience is smart enough to read between the lines, but then again, the audience doesn’t understand the difference between the internet and services on the internet, so I suppose I wasn’t smart enough to recognize that I couldn’t be so generous. I too am part of the same audience.

                • ram
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  I guess you’re just too smart for people to understand.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Ah yes what an interesting internet that would be: nothing links to anything, you’re all alone, enjoy the empty internet