@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoApple bans use of ChatGPT internallywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up190arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up189arrow-down1external-linkApple bans use of ChatGPT internallywww.theregister.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square40fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoI agree with your sentiment if the tech were self-hosted, but there are huge security risks to pasting sensitive internal content into a third party took
minus-squareMentalEdgelinkfedilink1•1 year agoThat depends on what kind of agreement exists between your company, and that of the third party tool. Yes, in the worst case, the answer is “none”. But most workflows involve quite a lot of third party tools, only they are all licensed, and with clear details worked out for what data can go where. That employees are using such tools without there being a proper deal… Is a temporary problem to which a ban is not the solution.
I agree with your sentiment if the tech were self-hosted, but there are huge security risks to pasting sensitive internal content into a third party took
That depends on what kind of agreement exists between your company, and that of the third party tool. Yes, in the worst case, the answer is “none”.
But most workflows involve quite a lot of third party tools, only they are all licensed, and with clear details worked out for what data can go where.
That employees are using such tools without there being a proper deal… Is a temporary problem to which a ban is not the solution.