ProPublica released a new report on Friday detailing Justice Clarence Thomas’ close relationship with the Koch brothers with previously undisclosed and extraordinarily damning new details.

According to ProPublica, the justice developed a friendship with the Kochs as they were funneling hundreds of millions of dollars into right-wing causes, many of which ended up before the Supreme Court. The brothers then used Thomas to raise money for their sprawling network, inviting him to speak at “donor events” that brought in millions of dollars.

He disclosed none of these activities on his annual disclosure forms, an obvious violation of federal ethics law.

    • @DragonAce
      link
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s actually not legal to bribe a government official

      Well of course not, thats why they’re not called “bribes”, they’re called “campaign donations”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Are they campaign donations for the next time Thomas has to run for his lifetime appointed office?

    • @assassin_aragorn
      link
      61 year ago

      Problem is the people who are taking the bribery also get to determine the legality of it. SCOTUS could say that bribing a justice is totally legal and the only recourse would be a new amendment. Even then, I’m not sure what would stop them from ignoring the new amendment in their rulings.

      The problem with the court granting itself judicial review was that it didn’t come with checks and balances like the rest of the government functions.